On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 11:10:55AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:24:19 -0400,
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Currently, the default locale setting for the system can be accessed
> > only through /etc/environment, which is a configuration file for PAM.
> > Setting the locale
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 11:10:55AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:24:19 -0400,
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Currently, the default locale setting for the system can be accessed
> > only through /etc/environment, which is a configuration file for PAM.
> > Setting the locale
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 01:14:16AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:03:02PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > As some of you may have seen, there's a new version of glibc in unstable.
> > It has a couple of nice features - particularly for x86, where both
> > i686-optimiz
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:03:02PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> As some of you may have seen, there's a new version of glibc in unstable.
> It has a couple of nice features - particularly for x86, where both
> i686-optimized libraries and NPTL support are included. There are also
> sparcv9 l
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 12:47:11PM +1000, Ian Wienand wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:31:16AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Sure, I suppose so. Send me a dpatch against the linux-kernel-headers
> > package, please?
>
> Did you maybe mean a patch? It doesn't seem to use dpatches.
Thank
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 12:47:11PM +1000, Ian Wienand wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:31:16AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Sure, I suppose so. Send me a dpatch against the linux-kernel-headers
> > package, please?
>
> Did you maybe mean a patch? It doesn't seem to use dpatches.
Thank
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:31:16AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Sure, I suppose so. Send me a dpatch against the linux-kernel-headers
> package, please?
Did you maybe mean a patch? It doesn't seem to use dpatches.
-idiff -urN linux-2.6.0-test7-bk-orig/debian/patches/elf.h.patch
linux-2.6.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:31:16AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Sure, I suppose so. Send me a dpatch against the linux-kernel-headers
> package, please?
Did you maybe mean a patch? It doesn't seem to use dpatches.
-idiff -urN linux-2.6.0-test7-bk-orig/debian/patches/elf.h.patch
linux-2.6.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 02:02:51PM +1000, Ian Wienand wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 10:13:44PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > If you want to try it out, copy the relevant bits from i386.mk into
> > ia64.mk in debian/sysdeps/; it should be pretty easy.
>
> The attached makes the build go a
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 02:02:51PM +1000, Ian Wienand wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 10:13:44PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > If you want to try it out, copy the relevant bits from i386.mk into
> > ia64.mk in debian/sysdeps/; it should be pretty easy.
>
> The attached makes the build go a
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Le jeu 23/10/2003 à 04:10, GOTO Masanori a écrit :
>> This wishlist needs a bit consideration.
>>
>> (1) We store locale setting for 2 files - /etc/environment,
>> /etc/default_locale. Is it good idea?
>
> That's why I suggest to make it temporari
Le jeu 23/10/2003 à 04:10, GOTO Masanori a écrit :
> This wishlist needs a bit consideration.
>
> (1) We store locale setting for 2 files - /etc/environment,
> /etc/default_locale. Is it good idea?
That's why I suggest to make it temporarily. The locale setting could
also be read here by PAM
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Le jeu 23/10/2003 à 04:10, GOTO Masanori a écrit :
>> This wishlist needs a bit consideration.
>>
>> (1) We store locale setting for 2 files - /etc/environment,
>> /etc/default_locale. Is it good idea?
>
> That's why I suggest to make it temporari
Le jeu 23/10/2003 à 04:10, GOTO Masanori a écrit :
> This wishlist needs a bit consideration.
>
> (1) We store locale setting for 2 files - /etc/environment,
> /etc/default_locale. Is it good idea?
That's why I suggest to make it temporarily. The locale setting could
also be read here by PAM
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 02:02:51PM +1000, Ian Wienand wrote:
> > If you want to try it out, copy the relevant bits from i386.mk into
> > ia64.mk in debian/sysdeps/; it should be pretty easy.
> The attached makes the build go a lot faster for me :)
I've committed a slightly different fix to CVS.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 10:13:44PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > I built the new packages on one of our boxes, it appears to work
> > fine, however NPTL wasn't included. Before I look into it too much
> > futher I thought I might do your packages support NPTL it on ia64,
> > and are there a
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 10:13:44PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> If you want to try it out, copy the relevant bits from i386.mk into
> ia64.mk in debian/sysdeps/; it should be pretty easy.
The attached makes the build go a lot faster for me :)
Also, as I mentioned in this thread
http://sour
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 02:02:51PM +1000, Ian Wienand wrote:
> > If you want to try it out, copy the relevant bits from i386.mk into
> > ia64.mk in debian/sysdeps/; it should be pretty easy.
> The attached makes the build go a lot faster for me :)
I've committed a slightly different fix to CVS.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 10:13:44PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > I built the new packages on one of our boxes, it appears to work
> > fine, however NPTL wasn't included. Before I look into it too much
> > futher I thought I might do your packages support NPTL it on ia64,
> > and are there a
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 09:44:57AM +1000, Ian Wienand wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:03:02PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > As some of you may have seen, there's a new version of glibc in unstable.
> > It has a couple of nice features - particularly for x86, where both
> > i686-optimized
At Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:24:19 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 05:02:56PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le mar 21/10/2003 à 19:03, Daniel Jacobowitz a écrit :
> > > As some of you may have seen, there's a new version of glibc in unstable.
> > > It has a couple of nice
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 10:13:44PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> If you want to try it out, copy the relevant bits from i386.mk into
> ia64.mk in debian/sysdeps/; it should be pretty easy.
The attached makes the build go a lot faster for me :)
Also, as I mentioned in this thread
http://sour
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 09:44:57AM +1000, Ian Wienand wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:03:02PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > As some of you may have seen, there's a new version of glibc in unstable.
> > It has a couple of nice features - particularly for x86, where both
> > i686-optimized
At Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:24:19 -0400,
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 05:02:56PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le mar 21/10/2003 à 19:03, Daniel Jacobowitz a écrit :
> > > As some of you may have seen, there's a new version of glibc in unstable.
> > > It has a couple of nice
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:03:02PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> As some of you may have seen, there's a new version of glibc in unstable.
> It has a couple of nice features - particularly for x86, where both
> i686-optimized libraries and NPTL support are included.
Hi, I've been silently fol
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:03:02PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> As some of you may have seen, there's a new version of glibc in unstable.
> It has a couple of nice features - particularly for x86, where both
> i686-optimized libraries and NPTL support are included.
Hi, I've been silently fol
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 02:00:50PM -0200, Felipe Almeida Lessa wrote:
> Segundo os pergaminhos sagrados, alguém chamado Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> escreveu:
>
> > Now, we need to find the problems I _don't_ know about. I'd like for those
> > who feel comfortable testing a new glibc
Segundo os pergaminhos sagrados, alguÃm chamado Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> Now, we need to find the problems I _don't_ know about. I'd like for those
> who feel comfortable testing a new glibc - usual caveats about the quality
> of experimental software! - to give it a try
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 05:02:56PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mar 21/10/2003 à 19:03, Daniel Jacobowitz a écrit :
> > As some of you may have seen, there's a new version of glibc in unstable.
> > It has a couple of nice features - particularly for x86, where both
> > i686-optimized librar
Le mar 21/10/2003 à 19:03, Daniel Jacobowitz a écrit :
> As some of you may have seen, there's a new version of glibc in unstable.
> It has a couple of nice features - particularly for x86, where both
> i686-optimized libraries and NPTL support are included. There are also
> sparcv9 libraries. A
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 02:00:50PM -0200, Felipe Almeida Lessa wrote:
> Segundo os pergaminhos sagrados, alguém chamado Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> escreveu:
>
> > Now, we need to find the problems I _don't_ know about. I'd like for those
> > who feel comfortable testing a new glibc
Segundo os pergaminhos sagrados, alguém chamado Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escreveu:
> Now, we need to find the problems I _don't_ know about. I'd like for those
> who feel comfortable testing a new glibc - usual caveats about the quality
> of experimental software! - to give it a try
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 05:02:56PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mar 21/10/2003 à 19:03, Daniel Jacobowitz a écrit :
> > As some of you may have seen, there's a new version of glibc in unstable.
> > It has a couple of nice features - particularly for x86, where both
> > i686-optimized librar
Le mar 21/10/2003 à 19:03, Daniel Jacobowitz a écrit :
> As some of you may have seen, there's a new version of glibc in unstable.
> It has a couple of nice features - particularly for x86, where both
> i686-optimized libraries and NPTL support are included. There are also
> sparcv9 libraries. A
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 08:05:42PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> [please CC me as I'm not subscribed.]
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:03:02PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Also, I'd like for porters to build and test this and send debian-glibc
> > whatever patches were necessary. HPPA doesn
[please CC me as I'm not subscribed.]
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:03:02PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Also, I'd like for porters to build and test this and send debian-glibc
> whatever patches were necessary. HPPA doesn't build yet (hi Carlos); i386,
> PowerPC, and S/390 will be in the archi
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 08:05:42PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> [please CC me as I'm not subscribed.]
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:03:02PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Also, I'd like for porters to build and test this and send debian-glibc
> > whatever patches were necessary. HPPA doesn
[please CC me as I'm not subscribed.]
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:03:02PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Also, I'd like for porters to build and test this and send debian-glibc
> whatever patches were necessary. HPPA doesn't build yet (hi Carlos); i386,
> PowerPC, and S/390 will be in the archi
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:03:02PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> As some of you may have seen, there's a new version of glibc in unstable.
Joey has kindly pointed out that I'm out of my mind. "There's a new
version of glibc in experimental."
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:03:02PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> alpha, and arm should be buildable; mips, mipsel, m68k, and whatever else
> I'm forgetting about are still up in the air.
I built -6 from CVS as of "Wed, 15 Oct 2003 00:09:07 +0100" on mips. All
I can say at the moment is that it
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:03:02PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> As some of you may have seen, there's a new version of glibc in unstable.
Joey has kindly pointed out that I'm out of my mind. "There's a new
version of glibc in experimental."
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software
As some of you may have seen, there's a new version of glibc in unstable.
It has a couple of nice features - particularly for x86, where both
i686-optimized libraries and NPTL support are included. There are also
sparcv9 libraries. And the packaging has been totally redone for a number
of benefi
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:03:02PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> alpha, and arm should be buildable; mips, mipsel, m68k, and whatever else
> I'm forgetting about are still up in the air.
I built -6 from CVS as of "Wed, 15 Oct 2003 00:09:07 +0100" on mips. All
I can say at the moment is that it
As some of you may have seen, there's a new version of glibc in unstable.
It has a couple of nice features - particularly for x86, where both
i686-optimized libraries and NPTL support are included. There are also
sparcv9 libraries. And the packaging has been totally redone for a number
of benefi
44 matches
Mail list logo
