Re: debian/patches review

2002-11-15 Thread Michael Fedrowitz
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 03:25:36PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: Hi, I'm just taking a look at this patch - Is this to work around a toolchain bug? Not a bug, a feature. ;) Why is this a problem on m68k and not anywhere else? Because m68k is one of the very few platforms where there's

Re: debian/patches review

2002-11-15 Thread Michael Fedrowitz
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 03:25:36PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: Hi, I'm just taking a look at this patch - Is this to work around a toolchain bug? Not a bug, a feature. ;) Why is this a problem on m68k and not anywhere else? Because m68k is one of the very few platforms where there's

Re: debian/patches review

2002-11-14 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 07:44:43PM +0200, Michael Fedrowitz wrote: glibc22-m68k-fpic.dpatch 2.2 CVS:not in 2.3 CVS:not in Comment:Should be merged within upstream if it's ok. Status: merge Yes, this one would make sense, if upstream will

Re: debian/patches review

2002-08-11 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Wed, 7 Aug 2002 19:44:43 +0200, Michael Fedrowitz wrote: glibc22-m68k-compat.dpatch 2.2 CVS:not in 2.3 CVS:not in Comment:Should be merged within upstream if it's ok. Status: merge No, see bug #78937 for details. And I suppose most

Re: debian/patches review

2002-08-11 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Wed, 7 Aug 2002 15:47:41 -0400, Ben Collins wrote: string2-pointer-arith.dpatch 2.2 CVS:not in 2.3 CVS:not in Comment:I tested sample programs (compiled with gcc-2.95, 3.0, 3.1) stated in #45824, #44491, #44697, but I can't

Re: debian/patches review

2002-08-11 Thread Michael Fedrowitz
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 10:22:36PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: Hi, So, we should keep applying only the below patch as Debian specific? [...] And the same for lchown, see below for the full patch. -Michael diff -urN glibc-2.2.5.orig/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/m68k/chown.c

Re: debian/patches review

2002-08-11 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Sun, 11 Aug 2002 15:49:30 +0200, Michael Fedrowitz wrote: So, we should keep applying only the below patch as Debian specific? [...] And the same for lchown, see below for the full patch. Thanks! I've modified 'glibc22-m68k-compat.dpatch' with your patch in glibc CVS. -- gotom --

Re: debian/patches review

2002-08-11 Thread Carlos O'Donell
GOTO, Carlos O'Donell wrote: glibc22-hppa-unwind.dpatch 2.2 CVS:not in 2.3 CVS:not in Comment:After checking it's ok or not, then submit to upstream if it's correct. This patch is applied only kernel version