Re: libc6: ldd: bogus check for read permission

2007-02-06 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 08:04:33PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Pierre HABOUZIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > # ctl is in bcc > > reassign 149722 bash > > Fair enough (building bash with -DAFS is probably a good idea in any > case), but I'd still appreciate a response to the last line or so

Re: libc6: ldd: bogus check for read permission

2007-02-06 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Pierre HABOUZIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > # ctl is in bcc > reassign 149722 bash Fair enough (building bash with -DAFS is probably a good idea in any case), but I'd still appreciate a response to the last line or so of my original report: >> but I don't see any good reason for ldd to be chec

Processed: Re: libc6: ldd: bogus check for read permission

2007-02-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # ctl is in bcc > reassign 149722 bash Bug#149722: libc6: ldd: bogus check for read permission Bug reassigned from package `libc6' to `bash'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Bug#149722: libc6: ldd: bogus check for read permission

2007-02-06 Thread Pierre HABOUZIT
# ctl is in bcc reassign 149722 bash thanks On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 09:50:55PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Package: libc6 > Version: 2.2.5-6 > Severity: minor > File: /usr/bin/ldd > > ldd insists on bailing out if its argument fails "test -r", which in > turn may not always yield a terribly mea