Re: build profile proposal: nogir (second try)

2024-01-24 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 06:30:02PM +, Alberto Garcia wrote: > - Are packages that ship gobject-introspection files supposed to have >in the relevant build dependencies (gir1.2-*-dev, > gobject-introspection ?), or is the build profile handling this > automatically? This is not automati

Re: build profile proposal: nogir (second try)

2024-01-24 Thread Simon McVittie
As Johannes mentioned earlier in this thread, the first piece of practical advice on nogir should be: if you don't know that you need to use it, then perhaps you shouldn't. It's primarily aimed at breaking cycles, and enabling buildability in lower-level packages during bootstrapping. (Having said

Re: build profile proposal: nogir (second try)

2024-01-24 Thread Alberto Garcia
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 10:00:35PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > Here is the draft text that I added to the GObject-Introspection > mini-policy in 1.78.1-11: Hi, thanks for the explanation. A couple of questions about this: - Are packages that ship gobject-introspection files supposed to have

Bug#1061444: pcscd: GDM user is NOT authorized for action: access_pcsc

2024-01-24 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Package: pcscd Version: 2.0.1-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org Hello, When looking at the logs of pcscd, I see the following messages: jan 22 09:47:37 edoras pcscd[1663]: auth.c:125:IsClientAuthorized() Error in authorization: GDBus.Error:org.freedeskt

Re: gedit: problematic 'gnome-text-editor' alternative

2024-01-24 Thread Amin Bandali
Robie Basak writes: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 07:02:19AM -0500, Amin Bandali wrote: >> We received https://bugs.debian.org/1057184 last month about gedit's >> 'gnome-text-editor' alternative becoming problematic now that there is >> an actual gnome-text-editor package/binary. > > It sounds like th