Re: Packaging the new WebKitGTK+ 2.6 series

2014-08-06 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 06/08/14 13:25, Alberto Garcia wrote: > On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:14:13AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> An ITP is not needed. After all, this is just a new release of an >> existing package, with a different src name for technical reasons. > > Ok > >>> Opinions? Comments? >> >> S

Re: Packaging the new WebKitGTK+ 2.6 series

2014-08-06 Thread Alberto Garcia
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:14:13AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > An ITP is not needed. After all, this is just a new release of an > existing package, with a different src name for technical reasons. Ok > > Opinions? Comments? > > Sounds good! Let me know if you want me to take a look

Re: Packaging the new WebKitGTK+ 2.6 series

2014-08-04 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 04/08/14 15:20, Alberto Garcia wrote: > WebKitGTK+ 2.5.1 has just been published. This is the first > development release of the upcoming 2.6 series. > > WebKitGTK+ has two APIs: the classic one and the more recent > WebKit2. The classic one is now often referred to as "WebKit1". > > WebKit1 s

Packaging the new WebKitGTK+ 2.6 series

2014-08-04 Thread Alberto Garcia
WebKitGTK+ 2.5.1 has just been published. This is the first development release of the upcoming 2.6 series. WebKitGTK+ has two APIs: the classic one and the more recent WebKit2. The classic one is now often referred to as "WebKit1". WebKit1 supports GTK+2 and GTK+3, while WebKit2 only supports GT