On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 06:03:18PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> Don't you need to do the upload first, so that dh_haskell_depends does
> the right thing on the built packages?
dh_haskell_depends already does. dh_haskell_prep doesn't.
If haskell-devscripts was updated first, then it would use "gh
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 01:10:19AM +0200, Kari Pahula wrote:
> I'm sorry to say that that's not quite all. Some packages have also
> this: Build-Depends: ghc6 (<< 6.8.2-999). Those would need a
> sourceful upload. A quick grep-dctrl run reveals 15 of those:
>
> ftphs, haskell-anydbm, haskell-co
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 15.01.2009, 01:10 +0200 schrieb Kari Pahula:
> I need to repackage the upsteam GHC tarball, removing gmp-4.2.1.tar.gz
> from it and name the new version as 6.8.2dfsg1. Not the usual
> "+dfsg1", since when it is like this, it compares below 6.8.2+ with
> dpkg (thanks again,
I'm sure you'd all want to hear from 6.10.1 already. I haven't met
any difficulties with packaging that yet. Not done yet either.
Unfortunately, there's still one matter that needs to be fixed with
6.8.2 for Lenny.
Here's the deal: GHC includes a copy of GMP with it, which has GNU
documentation
Hi,
just for the record. If we wanted to avoid unnecessary unrecompilation
of dependent modules (as for example [1]), and we would go the way of
embedding the ABI in a Provides:/Depends: pair, then here is more
information on that:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Commentary/Compiler/Recom
