Re: Git?

Jérémy Bobbio writes: > (I am mostly lurking on debian-haskell@, so I don't think that my > opinion matters much: people doing work should have the tools that they > prefer to do so.) > > On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 09:40:39PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: >> > The only countercases I can image are 1) i

binNMU request generation script

Hi, for the Debian Haskell Group, I’ve started to write a script that calculates required binNMU requests (due to new dependencies). It is at a very early, prototypical state, but here are first results. I only ran it for i386, amd64 and powerpc this time: $ ./haskell-pkg-infos.py # Found ghc6 v

binNMU of haskell-haskeline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Can you please schedule a binNMU of haskell-haskeline? It is needed to build my package agda. Regards, Iain -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkpRCWwACgkQPy0SnCC/zccIRQCg0eK9PxpCHTEgA320AyIBqWQa OrwA

Re: Git?

(I am mostly lurking on debian-haskell@, so I don't think that my opinion matters much: people doing work should have the tools that they prefer to do so.) On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 09:40:39PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > > The only countercases I can image are 1) if you aren't on the internet > > r

Re: Git? (Was: Team maint update)

Hello Joachim. Em Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:31:35 +0200 Joachim Breitner escreveu: (...) > I’d suggest we > actually do have one darcs repository, containing the debian/ files, > per package. Ok. I moved my packages to this approach, and now I agree it's better. I updated the wiki page[0]. Good aft

Re: Darcs? Was: Git?

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 05.07.2009, 17:57 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > Thus I put the script in a new darcs repository „pkg-haskell-tools“: > > darcs get alioth.debian.org:/darcs/pkg-haskell/pkg-haskell-tools > http://darcs.debian.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi?r=pkg-haskell/pkg-haskell-tools;a=summar

Re: Darcs? Was: Git?

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 05.07.2009, 12:06 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > Oh, here is a prototype of what I’d imaging. I modified your script to > pkg-haskell-checkout[0], but I’d imagine this can be merged into > debcheckout if it works out[1]. > [..] > [0] I couldn’t push: > darcs: takeLock /srv/d

Re: RFS: agda

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 05.07.2009, 13:40 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane: > On 5 Jul 2009, at 11:13, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > I looked again over the contents of debian/, and it seems fine. Do you > > want it to be uploaded now? > > If you could that would be great, thanks a lot. $ LANG=C sudo apt-get i

Re: Debian Haskell Policy and group procedures

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 05.07.2009, 14:01 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane: > On 4 Jul 2009, at 21:16, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > I agree in spirit, but does someone know definitely that uploading a > > package where the person mentioned in debian/changelog is not in > > Uploaders makes no difference in it’s

Re: Debian Haskell Policy and group procedures

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, On 4 Jul 2009, at 21:16, Joachim Breitner wrote: I agree in spirit, but does someone know definitely that uploading a package where the person mentioned in debian/changelog is not in Uploaders makes no difference in it’s treatment by the arc

Re: RFS: agda

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, On 5 Jul 2009, at 11:13, Joachim Breitner wrote: I looked again over the contents of debian/, and it seems fine. Do you want it to be uploaded now? If you could that would be great, thanks a lot. Iain -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version

NMUing haskell-src-exts

Hi, I’m considering to NMU haskell-src-exts, as I’d like to see hlint in Debian. The other missing dependency, uniplate, is in NEW thx to Trent. Does anyone expect a version bump from 0.2.1~darcs20071212-2 to 1.0.1 cause problems (as parsec 2 to 3 did)? Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Bre

Re: RFS: agda

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 01.07.2009, 16:19 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane: > Not to hassle (ok, maybe a little...), but there's been no movement on > this in a while. Is anyone able to review/sponsor? I know reviewing > new packages is a lot of work (I do it for Ubuntu from time to time) > but it would

Darcs? Was: Git?

Hi, Am Samstag, den 04.07.2009, 22:31 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > May I propose a change to the darcs repository layout? I’d suggest we > actually do have one darcs repository, containing the debian/ files, per > package. The advantages are: > * A tool very similar to build-pkg-haskell can

GHC (Was: Git?)

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 05.07.2009, 13:33 +1000 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: > For me, with a crappy Australian internet connection that is a huge > win, especially if we eventually get GHC (which is big) into the > same repo. just a quick side-note: I don’t think its desireable to have the ghc packa