Re: cpphs adopted, haskell-src-exts NMUed

2009-07-06 Thread Florian Ragwitz
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 12:45:35AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > I also uploaded a NMU of haskell-src-exts. It made quite some version > bump. It no longer contains HaRP any more. Since I now build -doc and > -prof packages, this also ends up in NEW. The maintainer is Florian > Ragwitz and I ass

Re: binNMU request generation script

2009-07-06 Thread Trent W. Buck
Joachim Breitner writes: > [...] @debian-release: I have tried to merge equal lines for different > arches. [...] > > # Architecture: i386 > # Architecture: amd64 > # Architecture: powerpc Do such rebuild requests need to list all the wacky architecture variants, like i386-kfreebsd? If so, type

Re: Yay! pet.cgi is running

2009-07-06 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, In case you are wondering why haskell-x11-xft is listed under „Work in progress“: That’s because it is not owned by the group. If the Maintainer were the group, then this would be listed under a last section „Unclassified“. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer

Yay! pet.cgi is running

2009-07-06 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, after some "sed -i s/svn/darcs pet.cgi" (or something close :-)), we got a running instance of pet.cgi tracking our darcs repositories: http://pkg-haskell.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/pet.cgi It might well be that some links and features don’t work yet correctly, please tell me about it. Also

Re: Debian Haskell Policy and group procedures

2009-07-06 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Samstag, den 04.07.2009, 01:48 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane: > > The debatable details are: > > * Who sets the release to unstable, and when? > > * Who sets the git tag and when? > > With the proposed scheme, the release in the changelog indicates the > > desired state (package ought to be uploa

Re: cpphs adopted, haskell-src-exts NMUed

2009-07-06 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 07.07.2009, 08:56 +1000 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: > Joachim Breitner wrote: > > I just adopted cpphs for the DHG. Previous maintainer was Ian, who has > > given all his haskell packages up for adoption. > > Which ones? I don't see them in the WNPP lists. He said it on the

Re: cpphs adopted, haskell-src-exts NMUed

2009-07-06 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Joachim Breitner wrote: > I just adopted cpphs for the DHG. Previous maintainer was Ian, who has > given all his haskell packages up for adoption. Which ones? I don't see them in the WNPP lists. Erik -- -- Erik de Castro Lopo h

Re: I thnk we've alll been waiting for this one :-)

2009-07-06 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 07.07.2009, 08:35 +1000 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: > At last, haskell-parsec2 has made it from the Debian NEW queue > to unstable. ah, great. I know who did that, and maybe I’ll ask him directly earlier next time we have such a big blocker. ;-) Greetings, Joachim -- Joa

cpphs adopted, haskell-src-exts NMUed

2009-07-06 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, I just adopted cpphs for the DHG. Previous maintainer was Ian, who has given all his haskell packages up for adoption. The new package also contains a cabal library called cpphs, thus the upload ends up in NEW. The code can be found at http://darcs.debian.org/pkg-haskell/cpphs/ of course. I a

I thnk we've alll been waiting for this one :-)

2009-07-06 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
At last, haskell-parsec2 has made it from the Debian NEW queue to unstable. Cheers, Erik Begin forwarded message: Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:01:28 + From: Kari Pahula To: debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Subject: Accepted haskell-parsec2 2.1.0.1-1 (source all i386) -BEGIN PGP SIG

Re: haskell givebacks (manual, I promise :-))

2009-07-06 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 04:20:44PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Hi, > > unrelated to the automatic binNMUs I have spotted some build-failures > that will work now, so here are the give-backs. I hope that these > problems become less frequent when we can automatically schedule binNMus > with co

Re: binNMU of haskell-haskeline

2009-07-06 Thread Iain Lane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 19:52:46 +0100 Jurij Smakov wrote: > On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 09:13:32PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hello, > > > > Can you please schedule a binNMU of haskell-haskel

Re: binNMU of haskell-haskeline

2009-07-06 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 09:13:32PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello, > > Can you please schedule a binNMU of haskell-haskeline? It is needed to > build my package agda. I can potentially take care of it, but as I'm new here, you would need to co

Re: binNMU request generation script (couple of feature requests)

2009-07-06 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Montag, den 06.07.2009, 15:33 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane: > . o O { how about a dot graph? } you were a bit too early: http://ghcmutterings.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/visualising-the-haskell-package-dependency-graph/ :-) Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nom

Re: binNMU request generation script (couple of feature requests)

2009-07-06 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Montag, den 06.07.2009, 15:33 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane: > On 6 Jul 2009, at 14:48, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > Right, I missed these. Here is an improved output, with much more > > results. > > This is cool, good work! Do you think it would be possible to have a > html (or other human-rea

Re: binNMU request generation script (couple of feature requests)

2009-07-06 Thread Iain Lane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On 6 Jul 2009, at 14:48, Joachim Breitner wrote: Right, I missed these. Here is an improved output, with much more results. This is cool, good work! Do you think it would be possible to have a html (or other human-readable) output mode too?

haskell givebacks (manual, I promise :-))

2009-07-06 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, unrelated to the automatic binNMUs I have spotted some build-failures that will work now, so here are the give-backs. I hope that these problems become less frequent when we can automatically schedule binNMus with complete Dep-Wait lines. gb hdbc-sqlite3_2.1.0.2-1 . amd64 sparc . -m 'Try with

haskell givebacks (manual, I promise :-))

2009-07-06 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, unrelated to the automatic binNMUs I have spotted some build-failures that will work now, so here are the give-backs. I hope that these problems become less frequent when we can automatically schedule binNMus with complete Dep-Wait lines. gb hdbc-sqlite3_2.1.0.2-1 . amd64 sparc . -m 'Try with

Re: binNMU request generation script

2009-07-06 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi Marco, hi everyone else. Am Montag, den 06.07.2009, 08:58 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: > Em Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:16:39 +0200 Joachim Breitner > escreveu: > > # Architecture: amd64 > > # Needs binNMus for these sources: > > # missingpy, haskell-haskeline, hdbc-odbc, haskell-hsh, >

Bug#535967: Inconsistent state after removal.

2009-07-06 Thread Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva
Package: haskell-devscripts Version: 0.6.15+nmu11 Severity: normal Hello. I built network from hackage and installed with --user --prefix=$HOME/.cabal. Then, I tried to remove libghc6-parsec3-dev, which is a dependency of my home built network. So I got this message: ghc-pkg: unregistering par

Re: binNMU request generation script

2009-07-06 Thread Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva
Hi Joachim. Em Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:16:39 +0200 Joachim Breitner escreveu: (...) > I’ve started to write a script that calculates required binNMU > requests (due to new dependencies). Great. (...) > # Architecture: amd64 > # Needs binNMus for these sources: > # missingpy, haskell-haskeline, hdbc