Re: c2hs status

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:25:01AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Hi Simon, > > Am Montag, den 20.07.2009, 17:38 +1000 schrieb Simon Horman: > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 03:51:29PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > HI all, > > > > > > I've moved c2hs to darcs and removed the version in SVN

Re: Should haskell-devscripts depend on hscolour?

Hi, Am Montag, den 20.07.2009, 19:23 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: > Yes. The problem is that ghc6-doc, haddock and hscolour will always be > satisfied, even in arch-specific buildds, which wouldn't need them. This is, > of course, only in the case where .haddock is still in -doc pa

Re: Should haskell-devscripts depend on hscolour?

Hallo Joachim. Em Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:18:05 +0200 Joachim Breitner escreveu: (...) > Am Montag, den 20.07.2009, 19:03 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e > Silva: > > > This is actually a neat idea to avoid the sourceful uploads that I > > > mentioned in my last mail: If the upcoming haskell-devs

Re: Should haskell-devscripts depend on hscolour?

Hi, Am Montag, den 20.07.2009, 19:03 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: > > This is actually a neat idea to avoid the sourceful uploads that I > > mentioned in my last mail: If the upcoming haskell-devscripts that will > > move haddock files to -dev would depend on these five packages, it

Re: Should haskell-devscripts depend on hscolour?

Hallo Joachim. Em Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:59:29 +0200 Joachim Breitner escreveu: (...) > Am Montag, den 20.07.2009, 17:48 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e > Silva: > > Em Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:30:04 +0200 > > Joachim Breitner escreveu: > > (...) > > > haskell-devscripts, by default, build docs with

control file

Hallo Joachim. When I push to haskell-devscripts, it tries to search for a control file, which doesn't exist in this case. I think this is caused by pet in apply posthook. Do you think we should remove it? Auf Wiedersehen. -- marcot http://marcot.iaaeee.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi

Re: Should haskell-devscripts depend on hscolour?

Hi, Am Montag, den 20.07.2009, 17:48 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: > Em Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:30:04 +0200 > Joachim Breitner escreveu: > (...) > > haskell-devscripts, by default, build docs with hscolour. At the moment, > > every package needs a Build-Dependency on hscolour, despite ac

Re: Moving libraries' .haddock files to -dev packages

Hi, Am Montag, den 20.07.2009, 23:30 +0300 schrieb Kari Pahula: > Fortunately, all that's needed for this is a small change in > haskell-devscripts. I can NMU it (again) soon, along with uploading > ghc6, unless someone wants to say something about this. I should add that for all packages that h

Re: Should haskell-devscripts depend on hscolour?

Hallo Joachim. Em Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:30:04 +0200 Joachim Breitner escreveu: (...) > haskell-devscripts, by default, build docs with hscolour. At the moment, > every package needs a Build-Dependency on hscolour, despite actually > mentioning it anywhere. Woudn’t it make more sense to have > haske

Moving libraries' .haddock files to -dev packages

I'll be uploading GHC 6.10.4 soon. Now that we'd be building Haskell libraries again, I'd like to bring up .haddock files and binNMUs again. I'd like to have .haddock files moved from -doc packages to -dev packages. They're arch independent and, as such, could well stay in -doc packages but arch

Should haskell-devscripts depend on hscolour?

Hi, haskell-devscripts, by default, build docs with hscolour. At the moment, every package needs a Build-Dependency on hscolour, despite actually mentioning it anywhere. Woudn’t it make more sense to have haskell-devscripts depend on hscolour? Would it hurt somehow? Also, at least when the next c

Bug#537705: ITP: agda-executable -- Commandline interface to Agda -- a dependently typed functional programming language and proof assistant

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Iain Lane * Package name: agda-executable Version : 2.2.4 Upstream Author : Ulf Norell, Nils Anders Danielsson, Catarina Coquand, Makoto Takeyama, Andreas Abel, ... * URL : http://wiki.portal.chalmers.se/agda/ * License

DHG RC-Bug-free

Hi, just to keep everyone up to date: I’ve triaged the RC-bugs against our packages. pet.cgi currently lists four: http://bugs.debian.org/534038 pending by upload of haskell-edison-* to NEW http://bugs.debian.org/534023 fixed by recent haskell-devscripts upload, closed together with 9 more. htt

Re: c2hs status

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:59:12 +1000 Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > So how does the package actually get uploaded? Is that automatic? debrelease calls dput which does the upload Regards, Iain -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9

Fixed by newer haskell-devscripts

[found some more...] Hi Lucas, judging from the build logs, these bug were caused by parallel build flags. These were causing problems, but this was fixed in haskell-devscripts_0.6.15+nmu12. Closing these bugs. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.

Re: c2hs status

Joachim Breitner wrote: > you are very welcome to help sponsoring uploads. I’ve added you to the > group, here is a quick sponsoring howto: > > Once, get the tools repository > $ darcs get alioth.debian.org:/darcs/pkg-haskell/tools > Now, get the source > $ ./tools/pkg-haskell-checkout langauge-

Re: darcs-buildpackage???

Joachim Breitner wrote: > I looked at darcs-buildpackage, but it’s based around the principle that > the whole source, not just debian/, is in darcs. Also, I’m not sure what > advantage it has over > $ debuild -i -I Looks like its very little if any advatange. I'll just keep doing what I've been

Fixed by newer haskell-devscripts

Hi Lucas, judging from the build logs, these bug were caused by parallel build flags. These were causing problems, but this was fixed in haskell-devscripts_0.6.15+nmu12. Closing these bugs. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 |

Re: c2hs status

Hi Simon, Am Montag, den 20.07.2009, 17:38 +1000 schrieb Simon Horman: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 03:51:29PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > HI all, > > > > I've moved c2hs to darcs and removed the version in SVN. I also tagged > > the current release (0.15.1-4) and commited to darcs an UNRE

Re: darcs-buildpackage???

Hi, Am Montag, den 20.07.2009, 17:34 +1000 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: > Since we're using darcs, it might be nice to get something up on > the wiki about setting up and using darcs-buildpackage on stuff > in the pkg-haskell repository. I looked at darcs-buildpackage, but it’s based around the p

Re: c2hs status

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 03:51:29PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > HI all, > > I've moved c2hs to darcs and removed the version in SVN. I also tagged > the current release (0.15.1-4) and commited to darcs an UNRELEASED > version 0.15.1-5, whichs use haskell-devscripts instead of debhelper. >

darcs-buildpackage???

HI all, Since we're using darcs, it might be nice to get something up on the wiki about setting up and using darcs-buildpackage on stuff in the pkg-haskell repository. Cheers, Erik -- -- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.