Hi,
Am Freitag, den 24.07.2009, 16:49 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
> This new version of cdbs fails its unit tests when built on older
> distributions - is there a safe way to build haskell-http without it?
> Or maybe only a small patch to the current cdbs is required?
you can build with an old cdbs
This new version of cdbs fails its unit tests when built on older
distributions - is there a safe way to build haskell-http without it? Or
maybe only a small patch to the current cdbs is required?
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 21.07.2009, 12
Hi,
I have put haskell-hsql-{,-mysql,-postgresql} back into shape. They had
new upstream versions that made them compile with ghc-6.10.4.
But hsql-odbc and hsql-sqlite3 do not, and also don’t build on hackage.
Does anybody know if these are still useful, or maintained? If no one
steps up to do up
[taking the bugnumber out of the loop, zlib has been updated]
Am Freitag, den 24.07.2009, 23:32 +0100 schrieb Ganesh Sittampalam:
> On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > don?t worry, I believe that darcs? dependency is there for a good
> > reason. I just wanted to bring up this issue of
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Joachim Breitner wrote:
don?t worry, I believe that darcs? dependency is there for a good
reason. I just wanted to bring up this issue of reasonable dependency
vs. haskell platform in general.
Would shipping multiple versions in the same .deb be at all feasible?
Ganesh
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 24.07.2009, 14:30 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane:
> On 24 Jul 2009, at 14:10, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>
> > there is also the relatively common variant "agda-bin".
>
> How is this any better than -executable though? Seems to me like the
> same issues apply to both.
it is more co
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 01:50:38PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> the first upload of haddock causes FTBFS, and not all packages have
> Depwaits on haddock that should have.
>
> The attached file first sets dep-waits for all packages that have a
> depwait on ghc6 (automatically generated), and t
Hi,
On 24 Jul 2009, at 14:10, Joachim Breitner wrote:
there is also the relatively common variant "agda-bin".
How is this any better than -executable though? Seems to me like the
same issues apply to both.
Regards,
Iain
This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an at
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 24.07.2009, 13:03 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane:
> On 23 Jul 2009, at 02:50, Trent W. Buck wrote:
> > Why can't it just be "agda"? Even if there's a separate library
> > package, that would have the source name "haskell-agda" and binary
> > names
> > "libghc6-agda-{dev,prof,doc}",
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 23 Jul 2009, at 09:32, Joachim Breitner wrote:
now it starts: The platform specifies zlib-0.5.0.0... but using
something deprecated should be avoided.
I’m still not fully convinced that strictly to the platform is a good
idea.
This is int
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 23 Jul 2009, at 02:50, Trent W. Buck wrote:
Why can't it just be "agda"? Even if there's a separate library
package, that would have the source name "haskell-agda" and binary
names
"libghc6-agda-{dev,prof,doc}", so there'd be no conflict
Hi,
the first upload of haddock causes FTBFS, and not all packages have
Depwaits on haddock that should have.
The attached file first sets dep-waits for all packages that have a
depwait on ghc6 (automatically generated), and then depwaits for those
package that have already tried to build a packa
Hi,
libghc6-haskell-doc hat strict dependency on ghc6-doc, but (being
arch:all), it would not be updated by a binNMU. I did a sourceful upload
to fix this:
dw xmonad haskell-hgl haskell-x11-xft xmonad-contrib . ALL . -m
'libghc6-haskell-doc (>= 1.4.5-6)'
Danke,
Joachim
--
Joachim "nomeata" B
Hi,
you probably have noticed that a new ghc6 version is uploaded. One of
the changes is to move .haddock (due to it’s interface changing
regularly with the ghc6 releases) to the -dev package, where it can be
re-build by a binNMU. This of course requires haddock to be available at
install time.
K
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 24.07.2009, 12:14 +1000 schrieb Trent W. Buck:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:32:09AM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> >> Package: libghc6-zlib-dev
> >> Version: 0.5.0.0-2+b1
> >> Severity: wishlist
> >>
> >> Please upgrade haskell-zlib in Debian. The upcoming release of
> >> Da
15 matches
Mail list logo
