On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 06:54:09PM +, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 08:34:38PM +0200, Kari Pahula wrote:
> > Keeping ghc6-prof around is still worth it
> > since anyone can feel that 141MB.
>
> There's no point doing that if every other library package is going to
> depend on it.
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 08:34:38PM +0200, Kari Pahula wrote:
>
> Keeping ghc6-prof around is still worth it
> since anyone can feel that 141MB.
There's no point doing that if every other library package is going to
depend on it.
Thanks
Ian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-haskell-requ...@l
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 10:55:25AM +, Iain Lane wrote:
> I'm forwarding your mail to the Debian Haskell Group and to kaol,
Would you believe that I'm subscribed.
Personally, I think that moving to support shared libraries in time
for the next Debian release is not worth it. From the top of m
