Joachim Breitner writes:
> Am Dienstag, den 09.02.2010, 14:53 -0200 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
> Silva:
>> So should we remove debhelper from Build-Depends or leave it for
>> clarity?
>
> Hmm, not sure. But if we are already removing the stuff, then why not...
If you have a debian/compat valu
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 09.02.2010, 14:53 -0200 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
Silva:
> So should we remove debhelper from Build-Depends or leave it for
> clarity?
Hmm, not sure. But if we are already removing the stuff, then why not...
Gruß,
Joachim
--
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
Hi Joachim.
Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Ter Fev 09 14:31:41 -0200 2010:
(...)
> Am Dienstag, den 09.02.2010, 12:02 -0200 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
> Silva:
> > Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Ter Fev 09 07:28:50 -0200 2010:
> > (...)
> > > While we are at it: Should
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 09.02.2010, 12:02 -0200 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
Silva:
> Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Ter Fev 09 07:28:50 -0200 2010:
> (...)
> > While we are at it: Should we remove haddock, hscolour etc. from the
> > library build dependencies, and make them a dependenc
Hi Giovanni.
Excerpts from Giovanni Mascellani's message of Ter Fev 09 13:37:08 -0200 2010:
> Giovanni Mascellani ha scritto:
> > Yes, of course. That's strange, I always test my packages with
> > cowbuilder, maybe I missed this one. I'll do a new upload (and continue
> > on with happstack and git
Giovanni Mascellani ha scritto:
> Yes, of course. That's strange, I always test my packages with
> cowbuilder, maybe I missed this one. I'll do a new upload (and continue
> on with happstack and gitit packages) as soon as possible.
Ok, could you please upload it?
Thanks, Giovanni.
--
Giovanni Ma
Hiya,
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 12:02:08PM -0200, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva wrote:
Hi Joachim.
Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Ter Fev 09 07:28:50 -0200 2010:
(...)
While we are at it: Should we remove haddock, hscolour etc. from the
library build dependencies, and make them a depe
Hi Joachim.
Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Ter Fev 09 07:28:50 -0200 2010:
(...)
> While we are at it: Should we remove haddock, hscolour etc. from the
> library build dependencies, and make them a dependency of
> haskell-devscripts?
I think it's a good idea. Maybe we should do the
Joachim Breitner ha scritto:
> Am Dienstag, den 19.01.2010, 17:44 +0100 schrieb Giovanni Mascellani:
>> Still here to search some sponsor: now my package is haskell-feed. I
>> hope someone can find the time to review it and, if possible, sponsor it.
>
> just making sure you saw the mail on pkg-has
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 10:28:50AM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > The downside of this is that we'd need to do sourceful uploads of some
> > (most?) libraries, since they have a versioned dependeny on haddock.
> > Are we up to that?
>
> I think so. Marco recently got his account, so we can bot
Kari Pahula wrote:
> Hello. I'd like to upload the next version of ghc6 to unstable.
Just installed in a sid chroot here. Only minor problem was:
update-alternatives: warning: skip creation of /usr/bin/hasktags
because associated file /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/bin/hasktags (of link
group
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 09.02.2010, 11:09 +0200 schrieb Kari Pahula:
> Hello. I'd like to upload the next version of ghc6 to unstable.
Great! Thanks for your work so far.
> The downside of this is that we'd need to do sourceful uploads of some
> (most?) libraries, since they have a versioned depen
Hi Giovanni,
Am Dienstag, den 19.01.2010, 17:44 +0100 schrieb Giovanni Mascellani:
> Still here to search some sponsor: now my package is haskell-feed. I
> hope someone can find the time to review it and, if possible, sponsor it.
just making sure you saw the mail on pkg-haskell-maintainers about
Hello. I'd like to upload the next version of ghc6 to unstable.
I've merged haddock into the ghc6 package now. I want to build (and
patch, looks like nobody tested 2.6.0 with a ghc without ghci) only
one copy of the sources and seeing how it's included in upstream ghc
distribution tarball, I tho
14 matches
Mail list logo
