On 07/15/2010 10:49 PM, Kari Pahula wrote:
> Replying to debian-release too since they would have a thing or two to
> say about this.
>
Thanks!
A haskell transition isn't something we could describe as "a small
update", it
would take at least two weeks to have it done. We prefer to not start suc
Replying to debian-release too since they would have a thing or two to
say about this.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 12:08:55PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> As I can see it currently, the state of haskell in testing is quite
> well. So if we’d upload ghc6-6.12.3 to unstable now and do _not_ make it
> nomeata:
> >
> > this leads us to the question: What do we want in squeeze? Are we happy
> > with the current situation? Or should we try to get 6.12.3 and 2010.2.
> > ready?
>
Here's a more complete changelog,
http://code.haskell.org/haskell-platform/NOTES-2010.2.0.0
---
nomeata:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 14.07.2010, 15:41 -0700 schrieb Don Stewart:
> > Release candidate specification for the 2010.2.0.0 release of the
> > Haskell Platform is now available, the first encorporating GHC 6.12.3:
> >
> > http://code.haskell.org/haskell-platform/haskell-platform.c
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 14.07.2010, 15:41 -0700 schrieb Don Stewart:
> Release candidate specification for the 2010.2.0.0 release of the
> Haskell Platform is now available, the first encorporating GHC 6.12.3:
>
> http://code.haskell.org/haskell-platform/haskell-platform.cabal
>
> RC for th
