On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 10:53:50AM -0700, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
> >
> > I'm guessing that 7.0.1 will be the next GHC version packaged for
> > Debian.
>
> It is unlikely to be GHC 7.0.1 isn't it? That's the beta release.
It's not a beta release, but it is generally true that later point
relea
kaol:
> Hi.
>
> As you may be aware, the upcoming major GHC release will have a 7.0.x
> version number, not 6.14.x as previously planned. Most of Debian's
> Haskell packages have "ghc6" included in their names. Looks like it's
> time to either change that number to a seven or just drop it.
>
>
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 02.10.2010, 11:28 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
Silva:
> Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Sáb Out 02 11:05:32 -0300 2010:
> (...)
> > Marco, you recently worked on the -dev name consolidation, and thus know
> > about clean package renames. What modifications sh
Hi everyone,
I just had a look at the issue, backported the changes from 0.11.2 to
0.11.0 (we really don’t want to update more than necessary at this stage
of the freeze) but did not upload yet. The patch also changes the ABI,
so we’d need to rebuild all reverse dependencies (glade-0.11.0,
gtksour
Hi Joachim.
Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Sáb Out 02 11:05:32 -0300 2010:
(...)
> Marco, you recently worked on the -dev name consolidation, and thus know
> about clean package renames. What modifications should be done to rename
> the packages now? These should probably be implement
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 02.10.2010, 13:43 +0300 schrieb Kari Pahula:
> As you may be aware, the upcoming major GHC release will have a 7.0.x
> version number, not 6.14.x as previously planned. Most of Debian's
> Haskell packages have "ghc6" included in their names. Looks like it's
> time to either c
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 01:43:20PM +0300, Kari Pahula wrote:
>
> time to either change that number to a seven or just drop it.
Another option would be to change it to some kind of variable, so that
while the standard Debian packages get built as {ghc, libghc-foo-dev}
you could run "build-all-hask
Hi.
As you may be aware, the upcoming major GHC release will have a 7.0.x
version number, not 6.14.x as previously planned. Most of Debian's
Haskell packages have "ghc6" included in their names. Looks like it's
time to either change that number to a seven or just drop it.
Either option would re
