Re: Bug#616494: git-annex: FTBFS on various archs: undefined reference to symbol 'sem_close@@GLIBC_…'

Hi, Am Montag, den 07.03.2011, 15:02 +0530 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > Hmm, is this useful? I don’t see a real pattern. We see failures with > both versions of libc, with all four different versions of ghc > available, across different architectures... I now gave ghc or haskell-transformers back

Re: ghc dependencies in sid

Hi, Am Montag, den 07.03.2011, 20:19 +0530 schrieb Rustom Mody: > I tried to upgrade from debian testing to sid and got the message that > ghc and a whole load of libghc**'s would be removed. > > What should I do? from testing to sid this should not necessarily be happening. But I guess by the n

ghc dependencies in sid

I tried to upgrade from debian testing to sid and got the message that ghc and a whole load of libghc**'s would be removed. What should I do? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-haskell-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive

Fwd: ghc in debian sid

Maybe debian-haskell@lists.debian.org can say more about this. Cheers Christian Original-Nachricht Betreff: ghc in debian sid Datum: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 04:59:21 -0800 (PST) Von: rustom An: haskell-c...@haskell.org Newsgruppen: gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cafe I tried to move from deb

Re: Bug#616635: FTBFS on powerpc: error: 'ObjectCode' has no member named 'misalignment'

Joachim Breitner wrote: > Am Montag, den 07.03.2011, 19:39 +1100 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: > > Ok, I have a patch that allows ghc-7.0.2 to build on powerpc. To test > > it I installed the resulting packages, and then built the compiler > > again with the new compiler. All went well. > > > > My

Re: Bug#616494: git-annex: FTBFS on various archs: undefined reference to symbol 'sem_close@@GLIBC_…'

Hi, Am Montag, den 07.03.2011, 13:51 +0530 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > Strangely, on kfreebsd-i386 everything works fine. What is this > randomness? One difference according to the build logs is that the > failing build hat binutils_2.21-4 while the successful build had > binutils_2.21-3. The chan

Re: Bug#616635: FTBFS on powerpc: error: 'ObjectCode' has no member named 'misalignment'

Hi, Am Montag, den 07.03.2011, 19:39 +1100 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > I fixed my damn patch and now it has compiled. I'm going to try testing > > it by compiling it with the package I've just compiled. > > Ok, I have a patch that allows ghc-7.0.2 to build on pow

Re: Bug#616635: FTBFS on powerpc: error: 'ObjectCode' has no member named 'misalignment'

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > I fixed my damn patch and now it has compiled. I'm going to try testing > it by compiling it with the package I've just compiled. Ok, I have a patch that allows ghc-7.0.2 to build on powerpc. To test it I installed the resulting packages, and then built the compiler a

Re: GMP 5 uploaded to Debian, -dev package changed

Hi Steve, Am Sonntag, den 06.03.2011, 10:49 -0600 schrieb Steve M. Robbins: > > Am Sonntag, den 06.03.2011, 09:17 -0600 schrieb Steve M. Robbins: > > > OK, so I'll make an upload with libgmp10-dev providing both libgmp-dev > > > and libgmp3-dev. > > Done: just uploaded gmp_5.0.1+dfsg-6. > > Good

Re: Bug#616494: git-annex: FTBFS on various archs: undefined reference to symbol 'sem_close@@GLIBC_…'

Hi, Am Samstag, den 05.03.2011, 23:04 +0530 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > Am Samstag, den 05.03.2011, 18:15 +0530 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > > This seems to affects building any binary, including the next version of > > ghc (which causes bootstrapping issues with possible fixes), see > > http://lis