Directory name problem for -dev as well

2011-07-10 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, I just uploaded ghc-7.0.4, and stumbled upon a problem. ghc-7.0.4 did not change too much. Especially on 32bit architectures, it seems that the binary interface of base stayed the same (libghc-base-dev-4.3.1.0-91c38). This is great, as it means that we do not have to rebuild all libraries! Un

Re: Darcs FTBFS on some arches

2011-07-10 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Joachim Breitner wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 10.07.2011, 11:28 +1000 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: > > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > > > Looking at the tests, some of which are failing on my laptop. > > > > FTBFS can be recreated on amd64 if /bin/sh is dash instead of > > bash. > > > > Is there

Re: Darcs FTBFS on some arches

2011-07-10 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Sonntag, den 10.07.2011, 11:28 +1000 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > Looking at the tests, some of which are failing on my laptop. > > FTBFS can be recreated on amd64 if /bin/sh is dash instead of > bash. > > Is there a way to require that sh is dash in th

Re: Darcs FTBFS on some arches

2011-07-10 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Sonntag, den 10.07.2011, 10:36 +1000 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: > ยด> I'll give the package a good going over this w/e. > > Currently when people check out the packaging data from darcs > they get the following messages: > > Please send patches to me for review (`darcs send') rather