Re: Build failures on arm

2013-06-04 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 10:13:01PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 10:08:53PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > I though you said that GHCi has problems on arm. Is that related to this > > build failure: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=haskell-vector&arch=ar

Re: Build failures on arm

2013-06-04 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 01:58:31AM +0400, Alexander Danilov wrote: > On 05.06.2013 01:13, Colin Watson wrote: > >That's the R_ARM_V4BX problem I mentioned here: > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-haskell/2013/05/msg00054.html > > > >It isn't a TH failure as such, just one that comes up a lot

Re: Build failures on arm

2013-06-04 Thread Alexander Danilov
On 05.06.2013 01:13, Colin Watson wrote: On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 10:08:53PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: I though you said that GHCi has problems on arm. Is that related to this build failure: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=haskell-vector&arch=armel&ver=0.10.0.1-3&stamp=1369565

Re: Build failures on arm

2013-06-04 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 11:27:15PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > all very messy, with the problem now affecting non-GHCi packages. Quite. > I wanted to check the test suite output on armel, but the test suite > depends on libghc-vector-dev... > > I guess we can simply test your patch by uploa

Re: Build failures on arm

2013-06-04 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 04.06.2013, 22:13 +0100 schrieb Colin Watson: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 10:08:53PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > I though you said that GHCi has problems on arm. Is that related to this > > build failure: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=haskell-vector&a

Re: Build failures on arm

2013-06-04 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 10:08:53PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > I though you said that GHCi has problems on arm. Is that related to this > build failure: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=haskell-vector&arch=armel&ver=0.10.0.1-3&stamp=1369565567 > > I don’t see why GHCi would be

Build failures on arm

2013-06-04 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi Colin, I though you said that GHCi has problems on arm. Is that related to this build failure: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=haskell-vector&arch=armel&ver=0.10.0.1-3&stamp=1369565567 I don’t see why GHCi would be involved here, as there is no TH happening. Greetings, Joachim

Re: hmatrix

2013-06-04 Thread Denis Laxalde
Hi, Joachim Breitner wrote: I am too lazy to set up my sid schroot to use locally built packages (only my experimental schroot does that – somewhat disappointing that it even needs manual setup), so I’ll wait for libghc-storable-complex-dev to pass through NEW. If I don’t upload within one day a

Re: haskell-http-conduit failure on powerpc

2013-06-04 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi, On 2013-06-04 13:31, Colin Watson wrote: So a fix for this is in progress, but, of the four active powerpc buildds, only praetorius is running 2.6.32, and the rest are on 3.2. I've CCed the powerpc buildd admins; I don't suppose it would be possible to upgrade praetorius? it's DSA's call,

Re: haskell-http-conduit failure on powerpc

2013-06-04 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 09:05:37PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Colin Watson wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 08:38:05PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > > -- That definitely is function not implemented > > > > SYS_344(0x5, 0xf7c7e0f0, 0xf7c7

Re: haskell-http-conduit failure on powerpc

2013-06-04 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 08:38:05PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > -- That definitely is function not implemented > > > SYS_344(0x5, 0xf7c7e0f0, 0xf7c7e110, 0x800, 0x10a0) = -1 ENOSYS > > > (Function not implemented) > > >

Re: haskell-http-conduit failure on powerpc

2013-06-04 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 08:38:05PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > -- That definitely is function not implemented > > SYS_344(0x5, 0xf7c7e0f0, 0xf7c7e110, 0x800, 0x10a0) = -1 ENOSYS > > (Function not implemented) > > >From file /usr/include/powerpc-

Re: haskell-http-conduit failure on powerpc

2013-06-04 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > -- That definitely is function not implemented > SYS_344(0x5, 0xf7c7e0f0, 0xf7c7e110, 0x800, 0x10a0) = -1 ENOSYS > (Function not implemented) >From file /usr/include/powerpc-linux-gnu/asm/unistd.h #define __NR_accept4344 Erik -- --

Re: haskell-http-conduit failure on powerpc

2013-06-04 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > I'll try linux-image-2.6.32-5-powerpc64_2.6.32-48_powerpc.deb but I > > probably won't have results until tomorrow. > > Well I do see this problem on that kernel, but not on later ones. > > Strace output here: > > http://www.me

Re: haskell-http-conduit failure on powerpc

2013-06-04 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > I'll try linux-image-2.6.32-5-powerpc64_2.6.32-48_powerpc.deb but I > probably won't have results until tomorrow. Well I do see this problem on that kernel, but not on later ones. Strace output here: http://www.mega-nerd.com/erikd/strace.txt.gz I'll keep diggi