On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 12:44:37AM +0200, José A. Romero L. wrote:
> I've just installed the latest packages (version 1.0.2-1+b1) and they seem to
> be working fine. Thanks a lot!
Ah, sorry for the noise -- the package tracker doesn't show binNMUs.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PG
I've just installed the latest packages (version 1.0.2-1+b1) and they seem
to be working fine. Thanks a lot!
Cheers,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Sean Whitton
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 07:04:53AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> > >0.2.3.8, so we just need to binNMU
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 07:04:53AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> >0.2.3.8, so we just need to binNMU enclosed-exceptions, right?
>
> I think you are right, a lot of binNMUs of the above two packages are also
> shown here https://people.debian.org/~nomeata/binNMUs-haskell.txt
It do
Thanks for uploading of haskell-th-data-compat.
As next step, I pushed package plan and debianizations of some
packages which are used in HRR (deeper depth first in dependency
tree):
- haskell-quickcheck-simple
- haskell-th-reify-compat
- haskell-hdbc-session
- haskell-names-th
Please sponsor to
Hi,
>enclosed-exceptions's cabal file claims compatibility with lifted-base
>0.2.3.8, so we just need to binNMU enclosed-exceptions, right?
I think you are right, a lot of binNMUs of the above two packages are also
shown here https://people.debian.org/~nomeata/binNMUs-haskell.txt
G.
