gt; cdbs,
> ghc,
> ghc-prof,
> libghc-old-locale-dev,
> libghc-old-locale-prof,
> Build-Depends-Indep: ghc-doc,
> libghc-old-locale-doc,
> Standards-Version: 3.9.6
> -
>
> Anyway, I think it is important that fixed cabal-debia
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Kei Hibino wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I reported and fixed the problem of cabal-debian around detecting GHC
> built-ins.
>
> cabal-debian searches `package.conf.d' from output of `dpkg -L ghc',
> for example under `/var/lib/ghc/package.conf.d/',
> and matches filenames like
:00 2001
From: David Fox
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 09:28:47 -0800
Subject: =?UTF-8?q?Prevent=20ghc=20from=20looking=20at=20.ghci=20when=20pr?=
=?UTF-8?q?inting=20arch=20and=20os.=20=20This=0Achange=20was=20provoked?=
=?UTF-8?q?=20by=20a=20.ghci=20that=20tried=20to=20load=20source=20files?=
=?UTF-8?q
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Damien Couroussé <
damien.courou...@gmail.com> wrote:
For the deployment of binaries, deb packages seems a good option to me.
> So I was wondering if it could be possible to take advantage of the
> dependencies installed by stack to build debian packages.
You c
I have tried, but the result was very disappointing, and with the latest
release it stopped working altogether.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Sven Bartscher <
sven.bartsc...@weltraumschlangen.de> wrote:
> (This mail is mostly meant for Alexandre)
>
> As there was some confusion about the syntax of machine readable
> copyright files. The syntax of these files is explained here [1].
>
> If the explanation
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:20 AM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
>
> Also, the diff is not very readable :-)
>
> Heh - I just grab the string and putStr it!
I've just uploaded 4.31.2 which fixes the test suite. There were files
missing from the cabal package and the test data needed updating, along
with one or two other tweaks.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 19.08.2015, 13:20 -0700
I've uploaded cabal-debian-4.31 to hackage with the Joachim's recent
changes.
I will make a hackage release soon.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2015, 22:11 +0200 schrieb Alexandre Delanoë:
> > is it the right command ?
> > it does not seem to do anything.
> >
> you need to install cabal-debian from git, i.e.
> $
e takeover[1] before
> that but that may no longer be necessary.
>
> - Adam
>
> [1] https://github.com/haskell-infra/hackage-trustees/issues/42
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Joachim Breitner
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> Am Donnerstag, den 02.0
s/stacked/stackage/
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:25 AM, David Fox wrote:
> At least one of these packages is in stacked, specifically acid-state.
>
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Joachim Breitner
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think it would improve the quali
At least one of these packages is in stacked, specifically acid-state.
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it would improve the quality of Haskell in Debian if we are
> more focused on packages that are relevant, and regularly clear out
> cruft. With cruft,
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Unless I'm mistaken, the extra-depends mechanism seems broken at the
> moment, due to a bug introduced in the migration from makefiles rules to
> Dh_Haskell.sh:
>
I am somewhat responsible for the Dh_Haskell.sh changes, I will take
We should move to 7.10.2:
https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/10500#comment:3
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 4:47 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Samstag, den 06.06.2015, 18:03 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
> > However, I was able to get the correct value by applying this pa
When I first built ghc-7.10.1-5 it created this script
in debian/tmp/usr/bin/haddock-ghc-7.10.1:
#!/bin/bash
exedir="/usr/lib/ghc/bin"
exeprog="haddock"
executablename="$exedir/$exeprog"
datadir="/usr/share"
bindir="/usr/bin"
topdir="/usr/lib/ghc"
#!/bin/sh
exec "$executablename" -B"$topdir"
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 27.05.2015, 15:39 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
> > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Joachim Breitner
> > wrote:
> >
> > Also, it opens a new can of worm: Do we
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
In gitit's debian/rules present following check:
>
> ifeq (0,$(shell ghc --info | grep 'Have interpreter.*NO' >/dev/null 2>&1;
> echo $$?))
>
> When ghc have no interpreter?
GHCJS doesn't have an interpreter (yet.) That is, the interpreter
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
>
> Also, it opens a new can of worm: Do we have to provide libghcjs-foo
> packages for all our Haskell libraries? For none? For a few?
>
We build more and more libghcjs-* packages. I did the haskell-devscripts
patches to support this.
ee/master/patches
(yes, a strange place to keep them.) The tarballs in the links above show
what results when these packages are applied.
I think what you noticed is that you have to build ghcjs-tools before you
can build ghcjs. Yes, now I'm sure of it.
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Davi
Yes, you will need ghcjs
compiler
packages to build ghcjs libraries. I split it into two packages,
ghcjs
-tools
and ghcjs, but the debianization is probably not acceptable
- it puts stuff into root
during the build
. If you want to
look at it, you will find it here:
http://deb.s
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Sven Bartscher <
sven.bartsc...@weltraumschlangen.de> wrote:
>
> > Am 08.05.2015 um 05:38 schrieb David Fox :
> > > David, are you still planning on doing this, or should I jump in?
> >
> > On closer examination, it looks lik
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 07.05.2015, 17:14 +0200 schrieb Sven Bartscher:
> > > Am 07.05.2015 um 09:39 schrieb Joachim Breitner :
> > >
> > > just making sure that we don’t have the situation where everyone thinks
> > > the other one is
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:28 AM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 29.04.2015, 11:20 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> > Quoting Joachim Breitner (2015-04-29 11:13:57)
> > > I used /git/pkg-haskell/setup-repository. I hope that file was not
> > > completely bit-rotted.
> >
> > On
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
>
>
> We could just use that repo, and clone it on alioth. Did you import the
> whole history of haskell-devscripts? Using what tool?
Yes, by all means. I used darcs convert export | (cd
../git-haskell-devscripts && git fast-import) to
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 27.04.2015, 17:16 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:30 PM, David Fox wrote:
> > It is fixable.
>
> thanks for your patch. I wasn’t fully convinced (I
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:30 PM, David Fox wrote:
> It is fixable.
>
> Maybe :-(
It is fixable.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> but that is just a ugly work-around. The user of hlibrary should not have
> to guess throug how many layers of quoting this variable has to go.
>
> Yes, I'm hoping to find answer number two. Its looking a little ugly
though.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:54 PM, David Fox wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Joachim Breitner
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am Montag, den 27.04.2015, 14:28 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
>>
>> > Sorry about that! I will check it out.
>>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 27.04.2015, 14:28 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
>
> > Sorry about that! I will check it out.
>
> Thanks. I could not find an easy way to fix it, but maybe StackOverflow
> knows more:
&
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Sven Bartscher <
sven.bartsc...@weltraumschlangen.de> wrote:
>
> > Am 27.04.2015 um 15:49 schrieb Joachim Breitner :
>
> > hex? Do you mean hsx?
>
> Yes, I actually meant hsx. It turned out my current mail client is very
> aggressive when it comes to auto correctio
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 07:24:08PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > So maybe we simply do it as soon as possible?
>
> That's my preference.
>
> Mine as well.
I just pushed a patch to cabal-debian that changes all the old data-lens
code to lens, so it touches about 1000 lines. If you are editing
cabal-debian you should pull these patches so you can resolve any conflicts
with the least pain.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Samstag, den 28.03.2015, 15:13 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
> > Right, the ones in https://github.com/seereason/haskell-devscripts are
> > good.
>
> all applied (but not yet tested).
>
>
>
Right, the ones in https://github.com/seereason/haskell-devscripts are good.
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yes, simply point us to the git repo :-)
>
> Greetings, Joachim
>
> Am 28. März 2015 18:29:54 MEZ, schrieb David Fox :
>
Oh for Petes sake! My "corrected" set of patches is correct, but also
creates ".orig" files that should have been ignored. Is there some way I
can provide these patches without spamming everyone on the list with yet
another series of eleven emails?
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 a
gt; packages?
>
> Greetings,
> Joachim
>
>
> Am Freitag, den 27.03.2015, 09:14 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
> > These changes are available
> > at https://github.com/seereason/haskell-devscripts.
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:41 AM, David Fox wrote:
&g
---
Dh_Haskell.sh| 182 +++
Dh_Haskell.sh.orig | 137 +++
dh_haskell_blurbs| 18 +++--
dh_haskell_depends | 25 ---
dh_haskell_extra_depends | 5 +-
dh_haskell_provides | 21 ++
---
Dh_Haskell.sh | 22 +--
Dh_Haskell.sh.orig | 182 +++--
hlibrary.mk| 21 +++
3 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Dh_Haskell.sh b/Dh_Haskell.sh
index 1e1fce6..7cc690a 100644
--- a/Dh_Haskell.sh
---
dh_haskell_blurbs | 5 -
hlibrary.mk | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dh_haskell_blurbs b/dh_haskell_blurbs
index 6d6d3a2..be191bb 100644
--- a/dh_haskell_blurbs
+++ b/dh_haskell_blurbs
@@ -6,10 +6,13 @@
set -e
+DEB_DEFAULT_COMPILER=$1
+shi
---
Dh_Haskell.sh | 70 +++
1 file changed, 70 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Dh_Haskell.sh b/Dh_Haskell.sh
index c5b15b2..f0a2002 100644
--- a/Dh_Haskell.sh
+++ b/Dh_Haskell.sh
@@ -1,3 +1,73 @@
+cpu(){
+ ghc -e 'putStr System.Info.arch'
+}
+
+
---
dh_haskell_depends | 2 +-
hlibrary.mk| 4 ++--
hlibrary.mk.orig | 2 +-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dh_haskell_depends b/dh_haskell_depends
index b71cec4..4917092 100644
--- a/dh_haskell_depends
+++ b/dh_haskell_depends
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ for pkg
---
Dh_Haskell.sh | 137 +++
Dh_Haskell.sh.orig | 322 +
hlibrary.mk| 79 +++--
hlibrary.mk.orig | 2 +-
4 files changed, 475 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Dh_Haskell.sh.orig
dif
---
Dh_Haskell.sh| 20
Dh_Haskell.sh.orig | 22 +-
dh_haskell_blurbs| 3 +++
dh_haskell_depends | 3 +++
dh_haskell_extra_depends | 3 +++
dh_haskell_provides | 3 +++
dh_haskell_shlibdeps | 3 +++
7 files chang
---
dh_haskell_depends | 2 +-
dh_haskell_provides | 2 +-
dh_haskell_shlibdeps | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dh_haskell_depends b/dh_haskell_depends
index 4917092..f23271b 100644
--- a/dh_haskell_depends
+++ b/dh_haskell_depends
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ for pk
---
hlibrary.mk | 4 ++--
hlibrary.mk.orig | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hlibrary.mk b/hlibrary.mk
index 20e831a..1e16de9 100644
--- a/hlibrary.mk
+++ b/hlibrary.mk
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ $(DEB_SETUP_BIN_NAME):
for setup in Setup.lhs Setup.hs;
---
hlibrary.mk | 7 +-
hlibrary.mk.orig | 229 +++
2 files changed, 233 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 hlibrary.mk.orig
diff --git a/hlibrary.mk b/hlibrary.mk
index b7f046b..fb91ca5 100644
--- a/hlibrary.mk
+++ b/hlibr
---
hlibrary.mk | 2 +-
hlibrary.mk.orig | 7 ---
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hlibrary.mk b/hlibrary.mk
index fb91ca5..5408863 100644
--- a/hlibrary.mk
+++ b/hlibrary.mk
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ install/libghc-$(CABAL_PACKAGE)-dev:: debian/tmp-inst-ghc
debia
These changes are available at
https://github.com/seereason/haskell-devscripts.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:41 AM, David Fox wrote:
> These eleven patches start with some bug fixes, followed by some
> fairly major changes to parameterize the haskell compiler name,
> finally adding su
Ugh, I think maybe gmail's line wrapping broke these patches.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:46 AM, David Fox wrote:
> I should have mentioned that these patches are for the haskell-devscripts
> package. Also, I've been using them for over a year, the 150 builds I
> mentio
I should have mentioned that these patches are for the haskell-devscripts
package. Also, I've been using them for over a year, the 150 builds I
mention are just for this version 0.9 compatibility update.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:41 AM, David Fox wrote:
> These eleven patches start w
---
Dh_Haskell.sh | 22 +-
hlibrary.mk | 21 +
2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Dh_Haskell.sh b/Dh_Haskell.sh
index 1e1fce6..7cc690a 100644
--- a/Dh_Haskell.sh
+++ b/Dh_Haskell.sh
@@ -6,6 +6,14 @@ os(){
ghc -e 'putStr Syst
Optional - its nice to have this so you can uncomment and see what
haskell-devscripts is actually doing.
---
Dh_Haskell.sh| 20
dh_haskell_blurbs| 3 +++
dh_haskell_depends | 3 +++
dh_haskell_extra_depends | 3 +++
dh_haskell_provides | 3 ++
The call to packages_hc won't work without this change.
---
dh_haskell_blurbs | 5 -
hlibrary.mk | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dh_haskell_blurbs b/dh_haskell_blurbs
index 6d6d3a2..be191bb 100644
--- a/dh_haskell_blurbs
+++ b/dh_haskell_blurbs
@@ -
---
Dh_Haskell.sh| 182 +++
dh_haskell_blurbs| 18 +++--
dh_haskell_depends | 25 ---
dh_haskell_extra_depends | 5 +-
dh_haskell_provides | 21 +++---
dh_haskell_shlibdeps | 10 +--
hlibrary.mk |
---
Dh_Haskell.sh | 137 ++
hlibrary.mk | 79 +++--
2 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Dh_Haskell.sh b/Dh_Haskell.sh
index f0a2002..4e56b64 100644
--- a/Dh_Haskell.sh
+++ b/Dh_Hask
---
dh_haskell_depends | 2 +-
dh_haskell_provides | 2 +-
dh_haskell_shlibdeps | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dh_haskell_depends b/dh_haskell_depends
index 4917092..f23271b 100644
--- a/dh_haskell_depends
+++ b/dh_haskell_depends
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ for pk
These functions are used by the forthcoming bash translations of the make rules.
---
Dh_Haskell.sh | 70 +++
1 file changed, 70 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Dh_Haskell.sh b/Dh_Haskell.sh
index c5b15b2..f0a2002 100644
--- a/Dh_Haskell.sh
+++ b/
Here we pass the values appropriate for ghc, later these get parameterized.
---
hlibrary.mk | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hlibrary.mk b/hlibrary.mk
index 20e831a..1e16de9 100644
--- a/hlibrary.mk
+++ b/hlibrary.mk
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ $(DEB_SETUP_BIN_NAME):
Keeping these would make the subsequent changes uglier.
---
dh_haskell_depends | 2 +-
hlibrary.mk| 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dh_haskell_depends b/dh_haskell_depends
index b71cec4..4917092 100644
--- a/dh_haskell_depends
+++ b/dh_haskell_depend
---
hlibrary.mk | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hlibrary.mk b/hlibrary.mk
index fb91ca5..5408863 100644
--- a/hlibrary.mk
+++ b/hlibrary.mk
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ install/libghc-$(CABAL_PACKAGE)-dev::
debian/tmp-inst-ghc debian/extra-depends
$(if $(HASKELL_HIDE_P
0 ghc packages and 50 ghcjs packages
with these changes.
David Fox (11):
Allow building of documentation when when package has no Haskell
modules
Fix a bash error - single quote prevents expansion of shell variables
Remove support for obsolete doc package prefix 'haskell-'
Pass --w
At times there have been cabal packages with no modules whose build
would fail without this patch - the earliest version of
transformers-compat for example.
---
hlibrary.mk | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hlibrary.mk b/hlibrary.mk
index b7f046b..fb91ca5
Ah, my support for old utf8-string was broken. I will upload again.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Sven Bartscher <
sven.bartsc...@weltraumschlangen.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 10:54:49 -0700
> David Fox wrote:
>
> > Ok, I've uploaded hsx2hs-0.13.3 to hackag
It turned out that Jeremy Shaw already had upload rights, and he works for
me. ;-)
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Sven Bartscher <
sven.bartsc...@weltraumschlangen.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 10:54:49 -0700
> David Fox wrote:
>
> > Ok, I've uploaded hsx2
Ok, I've uploaded hsx2hs-0.13.3 to hackage, with updated repository path.
GHC-7.10 support is waiting for changes to haskell-src-meta.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:39 AM, Sven Bartscher <
sven.bartsc...@weltraumschlangen.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:50:43 -0700
> David Fox
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 18.03.2015, 14:38 +0100 schrieb Sven Bartscher:
> > Last year it was brought up, to automate the packaging process
> > completely and creating the packages out of the package plan.
> > I didn't follow the discussi
tsc...@weltraumschlangen.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:50:43 -0700
> David Fox wrote:
>
> > We build with the changes in https://github.com/seereason/hsx2hs.git.
>
> That looks good, but it would be better, if there would be a release on
> hackage, since our infrastructure bu
We build with the changes in https://github.com/seereason/hsx2hs.git.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Sven Bartscher <
sven.bartsc...@weltraumschlangen.de> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm writing to you, because you are listed as maintainer of the haskell
> package hsx2hs.
>
> We (the Debian Haskel
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> On 2015-01-09, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>
> #. I would prefer section by default `unknown`
>
I'm adding a --source-section option to version 4.20.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>
> Sounds nice. But HEAD is one commit from 4.19. Maybe package it? I
> tried, and it depends on debian-3.85. I `cabal unpack debian` it, and
> there is debian/ in it. What should I do with it?
>
That debianization is my doing - it is supp
Oh, and there is a debian/Debianize.hs script in the cabal-debian package
itself, one of the unit tests runs it and compares the result to the debian
directory in the git repository.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 5:31 AM, David Fox wrote:
> I use the cabal-debian library in a bunch of private packa
res the cabal-debian
library to run.
You can see an example of a debian/Debianize.hs script here:
https://github.com/clckwrks/clckwrks-dot-com/blob/master/debian/Debianize.hs
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Am Freitag, den 09.01.2015, 13:55 +0300 sch
Also, cabal-debian should be producing library debs, if it isn't there may
be a bug.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 5:16 AM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am confused about how should I setup my development environment to
> develop haskell packages. I want to improve cabal-debian-4.17.4, since
>
You are better off building these packages from the github source for right
now - cabal-debian is in a development phase
https://github.com/ddssff/cabal-debian
https://github.com/ddssff/debian-haskell
If you check these out right next to each other and set the "local-debian"
flag to "Default: Tru
I would be a little sad to see the parsing of a debianization go, though
I'm not sure I use that feature in real life. Today I am going to take a
stab at the second option (making it do what we want it to do) and if that
doesn't work I will consider the first option (simplified cabal-debian.) I
ha
Thanks I will look at these soon.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I filed a few more issues at
> https://github.com/ddssff/cabal-debian/issues but to not only file
> issues, I fixed a few of them.
>
> I didn’t want to push to cabal-debian directly without
4, 13:29 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
>
> >
> > This has so far been necessary for building ghcjs libraries.
>
> I get it now.
>
>
> > * Move the make recipes from hlibrary.mk to Dh_Haskell.sh
> > Nice cleanup
> > * Add a
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
>
> If you create the repo there soon I’ll start filing a few issues of
> things that I’d do differently (otherwise I’ll use the bts for now and
> copy them later, which is fine as well).
>
No sooner said than done!
https://github.com/dds
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
>
>
> Greetings from Portland,
>
> I should have gone, but I'm not a Debian developer. ;-)
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
* Allow building of documentation when when package has no Haskell modules
> ✓
> * Fix a bash bug in the dev library install recipe
> ✓
> * Remove cases for binary debs in the ghc package - haskell-devscripts is
> not a build dependency of
That is great news! I think my preference would be to move it to github.com
(I was actually in the process of doing this today - is it ok if I
proceed?) and continue to be the upstream developer - there are some ugly
corners I hope to gradually smooth out. I would hate for anyone to see the
modul
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 01.07.2014, 15:30 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
> > Joachim, is there a procedure for submitting changes to
> > haskell-devscripts? I have changes to support the building of
> > librar
vid
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:39 AM, David Fox wrote:
> Thanks, I will look into this.
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Sven Bartscher <
> sven.bartsc...@weltraumschlangen.de> wrote:
>
>> Dear maintainer,
>>
>> We recently dealt with a bug in you
Thanks, I will look into this.
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Sven Bartscher <
sven.bartsc...@weltraumschlangen.de> wrote:
> Dear maintainer,
>
> We recently dealt with a bug in you package, cabal-debian, about
> dependencies not being mapped to lowercase before being added to the
> debianizati
On the page
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi?r=pkg-haskell/ghc;a=summary
there is a link to the darcs repository, but it is not valid. What should
it be?
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:38 AM, David Fox wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Joachim Breitner
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am Sonntag, den 13.07.2014, 21:54 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
>>
>> > I'm almost certain now that libtinfo-dev should be
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Sonntag, den 13.07.2014, 21:54 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
>
> > I'm almost certain now that libtinfo-dev should be a dependency of ghc
> > if it exports terminfo. If so, I apologize in advance -
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We got https://bugs.debian.org/753183 a while ago, and I guess we want
> to upload the latest version of cabal-debian. Who of the DHG group uses
> this package and would like to prepare an upload? There is a new major
> version o
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Sonntag, den 13.07.2014, 07:50 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Joachim Breitner
> > wrote:
> > Am Freitag, den 11.07.2014, 13:12 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
&
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Freitag, den 11.07.2014, 13:12 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
>
> > Either way works for me, it is just that I'm getting build errors
> > because our builder decides it needs to build those packages an
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Freitag, den 11.07.2014, 13:12 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
>
> > Either way works for me, it is just that I'm getting build errors
> > because our builder decides it needs to build those packages an
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Freitag, den 11.07.2014, 06:03 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
> > I believe that these packages should be in the Provides line for the
> > ghc-doc package:
> >
> >
> > libghc-binary-doc
>
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 8:42 AM, David Fox wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Joachim Breitner
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am Freitag, den 11.07.2014, 06:03 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
>> > I believe that these packages should be in t
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Freitag, den 11.07.2014, 06:03 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
> > I believe that these packages should be in the Provides line for the
> > ghc-doc package:
> >
> >
> > libghc-binary-doc
>
I believe that these packages should be in the Provides line for the
ghc-doc package:
libghc-binary-doc
libghc-haskeline-doc
libghc-terminfo-doc
libghc-xhtml-doc
ghc-doc contains a .haddock file for each of them.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Joachim Breitner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 01.07.2014, 15:30 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
> > Joachim, is there a procedure for submitting changes to
> > haskell-devscripts? I have changes to support the building of
> > librar
Joachim, is there a procedure for submitting changes to haskell-devscripts?
I have changes to support the building of libraries using ghcjs I'd like
to submit.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 09.06.2014, 14:04 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
>> Excellent! Could we have a similarly modified build of 7.8 in experimental?
>
> just merged these and other changes from unstable to experimental
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo