Dmitry Bogatov:
> Second problem is that I get different *.{hi,dyn_hi,so} libraries.
> Binary diff did not revealed anything useful -- just different letters
> in middle of file, with no recognizeble to me meaning. What information
> is stored in these files? What tools can help me find difference?
Joachim Breitner:
> Am Freitag, den 14.02.2014, 13:39 +0100 schrieb Jérémy Bobbio:
> > > Do you have the files somewhere? It would be most useful to compare the
> > > outputs of
> > > $ ghc --show-iface .hi
> > > and see where exactly the differe
Joachim Breitner:
> > Good news is that in the set of 6887 source packages, there were many
> > Haskell packages which produced matching binary packages [2]:
> […]
> That’s not many comparted to the 600 we have...
177 packages with a name startig by haskell were tested. So yes,
progress can probab
Hi!
Reproducible builds for Debian are very much a work-in-progress [1].
With David Suárez, we've recently the build+rebuild of a large number of
package to see how varying time and build path would affect their
reproducibility.
Good news is that in the set of 6887 source packages, there were man
talling the new
> version be told that they should delete the old db?
If it's the case, I think a dedicated -data package with a strict
dependency might be better. How big would it be?
Cheers,
--
Jérémy Bobbio.''`.
lu...@debian.org: :
r the wall before it was took
by others. I don't think listing me as upstream author is really
deserved…
Cheers,
--
Jérémy Bobbio.''`.
lu...@debian.org: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism
`. `'`
ts release tarballs. Rebuilding a stripped tarball is really easy
using git and pristine-tar, and it's easily to continue to do so when
upstream realeses new versions.
And non-DFSG documentation is not that uncommon…
Cheers,
--
Jérémy Bobbio
