Re: [Pkg-haskell-commits] darcs: haskell-hashable: Disable calls to mmap in testsuite, whose failure prevented build

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 08:51:28PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 24.10.2013, 19:19 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > > But it is worth a try with arch(powerpc64) as well... > > nope, doesn’t help either. Looks like someone needs to have a closer > look. Volunteers? You need

Re: [Pkg-haskell-commits] darcs: haskell-hashable: Disable calls to mmap in testsuite, whose failure prevented build

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 24.10.2013, 19:19 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > But it is worth a try with arch(powerpc64) as well... nope, doesn’t help either. Looks like someone needs to have a closer look. Volunteers? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@d

Re: [Pkg-haskell-commits] darcs: haskell-hashable: Disable calls to mmap in testsuite, whose failure prevented build

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 24.10.2013, 17:34 +0200 schrieb Louis Bettens: > Hi Joachim, > > did not work on powerpc: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=haskell-hashable&arch=powerpc&ver=1.2.1.0-2&stamp=1382618833 > > > > Greetings, > > Joachim > > > But passed on armel... Could porpora

Re: [Pkg-haskell-commits] darcs: haskell-hashable: Disable calls to mmap in testsuite, whose failure prevented build

Hi Joachim, did not work on powerpc: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=haskell-hashable&arch=powerpc&ver=1.2.1.0-2&stamp=1382618833 Greetings, Joachim But passed on armel... Could porpora be 64bits ? Louis -- When I grow up, I will run a Tor node around the clock, To help threat

Re: [Pkg-haskell-commits] darcs: haskell-hashable: Disable calls to mmap in testsuite, whose failure prevented build

Hi Louis, Am Donnerstag, den 24.10.2013, 14:14 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > Am Donnerstag, den 24.10.2013, 12:15 +0200 schrieb Louis Bettens: > > Which is defined and passed on by configure, line 3681. I give up > > swimming up to the definition of target_cpu, partly because I shouldn't > >

Re: [Pkg-haskell-commits] darcs: haskell-hashable: Disable calls to mmap in testsuite, whose failure prevented build

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 24.10.2013, 12:15 +0200 schrieb Louis Bettens: > Which is defined and passed on by configure, line 3681. I give up > swimming up to the definition of target_cpu, partly because I shouldn't > have been reading this generated script in the first place, but I can > neverthel

Re: [Pkg-haskell-commits] darcs: haskell-hashable: Disable calls to mmap in testsuite, whose failure prevented build

Le 23. 10. 13 23:14, Joachim Breitner a écrit : are you sure that that Cabal uses the same architecture names as Debian does? Greetings, Joachim Good morning, That's a tough question. After investigation, I found that armel and armhf didn't exist and that arm was probably their synonym. Here

Re: [Pkg-haskell-commits] darcs: haskell-hashable: Disable calls to mmap in testsuite, whose failure prevented build

Hi Louis, Am Mittwoch, den 23.10.2013, 20:55 + schrieb Louis Bettens: > +- if !os(windows) > ++ if !os(windows) && !(arch(armel) || arch(armhf) || arch(mips) || > arch(mipsel) || arch(powerpc)) are you sure that that Cabal uses the same architecture names as Debian does? Greetings, Joachi