Hi,
Am Freitag, den 06.01.2012, 07:42 +0100 schrieb Karel Gardas:
> On 01/ 2/12 09:18 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > A proper fix would be a configure flag as requested in
> > http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/5739 – if you want to provide
> > that, that would be helpful.
>
> The fix is
On 01/ 2/12 09:18 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
A proper fix would be a configure flag as requested in
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/5739 – if you want to provide
that, that would be helpful.
The fix is there, tested on my i.MX53 board and hopefully David is going
to commit it to HE
On 01/ 2/12 09:01 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Dear Karel again,
Am Montag, den 02.01.2012, 19:43 + schrieb Joachim Breitner:
I’ll prepare an upload now. I’m still a bit confused by the fact that
not even the configure script seems to check for the llvm binary, but
I’ll see how it goes.
it
Hi,
Am Montag, den 02.01.2012, 21:07 +0100 schrieb Karel Gardas:
> > it’s still building locally (on and64), only then I can upload the
> > package and it will be attempted to be built for armel. One thing that
> > is worrying me is the llvm version. The "llvm" Debian package installs
> > llvm-2.9
On 01/ 2/12 08:43 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
thanks for the heads up. We are very interested in improving the Haskell
situation on exotic architectures.
That's great to hear since I did not hold this hope seeing debian
provides all the builds unregisterised. So very well and thanks a lot
for y
Dear Karel again,
Am Montag, den 02.01.2012, 19:43 + schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> I’ll prepare an upload now. I’m still a bit confused by the fact that
> not even the configure script seems to check for the llvm binary, but
> I’ll see how it goes.
it’s still building locally (on and64), only t
Dear Karel,
Am Montag, den 02.01.2012, 18:06 +0100 schrieb Karel Gardas:
> On 01/ 2/12 12:46 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > Dear Karel,
> >
> > I hope you don’t mind dragging this discussion onto d-haskell, the right
> > forum for this, as we are maintaining GHC in a team.
>
> that's cool, let's
Hi,
On 01/ 2/12 12:46 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Dear Karel,
I hope you don’t mind dragging this discussion onto d-haskell, the right
forum for this, as we are maintaining GHC in a team.
that's cool, let's see if I'm able to post to the list or it's private.
Am Montag, den 02.01.2012, 10:
Dear Karel,
I hope you don’t mind dragging this discussion onto d-haskell, the right
forum for this, as we are maintaining GHC in a team.
Am Montag, den 02.01.2012, 10:30 +0100 schrieb Karel Gardas:
> let me ask, are you GHC debian developer/packager? If so, may I ask you
> to switch to use regi
Dear GHC team,
I tried to fix these problems myself, and three of the bugs had more or
less trivial solutions (that hopefully are right):
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/5733
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/5735
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/5734
However, this
Dear GHC team,
for your convenience, I have filed individual bugs about the build
errors:
Am Freitag, den 23.12.2011, 14:54 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> the build system seems to be quite confused on arch/os-combinations
> besides {i386,amd64}/linux. All these worked fine with 7.2.2:
>
> ht
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 24.12.2011, 08:28 +1100 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo:
> Joachim Breitner wrote:
>
> > ghc-stage2: panic! (the 'impossible' happened)
> > (GHC version 7.4.0.20111219 for powerpc-unknown-linux):
> > Cant do annotations without GHCi
> > {libraries/vector/Data/Vector/Fusi
Joachim Breitner wrote:
> ghc-stage2: panic! (the 'impossible' happened)
> (GHC version 7.4.0.20111219 for powerpc-unknown-linux):
> Cant do annotations without GHCi
> {libraries/vector/Data/Vector/Fusion/Stream/Monadic.hs:104:19-33}
> base:GHC.Exts.ForceSpecConstr{d rbL}
Thats re
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 21.12.2011, 18:29 + schrieb Ian Lynagh:
> Please test as much as possible; bugs are much cheaper if we find them
> before the release!
the build system seems to be quite confused on arch/os-combinations
besides {i386,amd64}/linux. All these worked fine with 7.2.2:
https:
14 matches
Mail list logo
