On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 02:48:50PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> I noticed that
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=haskell-happstack-authenticate
> is BD-Uninstallable almost everywhere. There's a newer version (2.3.2)
> in the package-plan, and the packaging in gi
Hi,
I noticed that
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=haskell-happstack-authenticate
is BD-Uninstallable almost everywhere. There's a newer version (2.3.2)
in the package-plan, and the packaging in git is in sync with the
package-plan, but the newer version hasn't been re
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 03.07.2015, 22:47 -0400 schrieb Gwern Branwen:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Joachim Breitner
> wrote:
> > You can install a more recent version of GHC independently of the
> > Debian packages and use that to make sure your packages work with
> > reasonable new dependenci
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> You can install a more recent version of GHC independently of the
> Debian packages and use that to make sure your packages work with
> reasonable new dependencies. I suggest to at least aim for
> compatibility with stackage LTS – this way,
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 03.07.2015, 16:29 -0400 schrieb Gwern Branwen:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Joachim Breitner
> wrote:
> > For Debian’s purposes, that is not an ideal situation, and we will
> > probably chose to remove it soon. It can be re-added later, if
> > there is user demand, of c
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> For
> Debian’s purposes, that is not an ideal situation, and we will probably
> chose to remove it soon. It can be re-added later, if there is user
> demand, of course.
It builds and runs fine with my current Debian testing system... Other
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 03.07.2015, 08:55 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Adam Bergmark
> wrote:
> > Where did this e-mail originate from?
> >
> > Anyway, mueval is not obsolete afaik, gwern has recently been
> > active in merging pull requests. There was talk about a pac
7.2015, 10:22 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
>> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Joachim Breitner > > > wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > currently, our package plan lists these packages as obsolete:
>> > >
>> > > happst
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 02.07.2015, 10:22 -0700 schrieb David Fox:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Joachim Breitner > wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > currently, our package plan lists these packages as obsolete:
> >
> > happstack 7.0.2 obsolete # need
Hi,
currently, our package plan lists these packages as obsolete:
happstack 7.0.2 obsolete # needs old happstack-server
happstack-heist 7.2.4 obsolete # needs old blaze-builder
hoauth 0.3.5 obsolete
iteratee 0.8.9.6 obsolete # needs old monad-control
lambdabot 4.3.0.1 binary key obsolete
Hi,
upgrading happstack-authenticate pulls in quite a few new dependencies.
Is it worth it? Who cares about happstack-authenticate?
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F
JID: nome...@joachim-b
Hi,
Am Montag, den 16.03.2015, 18:34 +0100 schrieb Sven Bartscher:
> I tried to install libghc-happstack-server-dev from the experimental
> repository on armel, but it wasn't possible, because it depends on
> libghc-hslogger-dev-1.2.1-61495, which is not available.
> I guess
Greetings,
I tried to install libghc-happstack-server-dev from the experimental
repository on armel, but it wasn't possible, because it depends on
libghc-hslogger-dev-1.2.1-61495, which is not available.
I guess haskell-happstack-server needs to be rebuilt at least on armel.
I checke
I believe hsp 0.8 / hsx2hs 0.12 are fine now[1]. The issue is that
the Happstack related packages like happstack-hsp, reform-hsp, etc,
need to be updated to use the new HSP library. The new hsp made a
couple great changes like switching from String to Text and changing
the package names, but that
What's the patch that needs to be applied to hsp 0.8 so that Happstack
can use it?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-haskell-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130413040908.ga30...@scru.org
Joachim Breitner writes:
> binNMUs scheduled (354 – see how the list of recent builds at
> https://buildd.debian.org/ is full of haskell-*). Why didn’t you say
> that you need the packages on i386?
Joachim,
I apologize if that sounded at all critical, as that certainly wan't my
intent.
The fact
Hi,
I wrote down a step-by-step instruction for Debian Haskell packaging. It's
basically for me (I easily forget things), but it might help.
http://www.mhatta.org/blog/2013/03/21/recipe-for-debian-haskell-packaging/
Best regards,
MH
2013/3/20 Michael Alan Dorman
> Daniel Silverstone writes:
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 20.03.2013, 07:55 -0400 schrieb Michael Alan Dorman:
> Well, that, and if any of the stuff in experimental got autobuilt for
> i386. ;)
binNMUs scheduled (354 – see how the list of recent builds at
https://buildd.debian.org/ is full of haskell-*). Why didn’t you say
that you
Am Mittwoch, den 20.03.2013, 08:12 + schrieb Daniel Silverstone:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 01:40:48AM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:45:02PM +, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> > > Crud, and not packaged :-(
> > >
> > > Oh well, cabal here I come.
> >
> > Please help
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 06:11:59AM -0700, David Fox wrote:
> I try to incorporate knowledge about packaging haskell into the
> cabal-debian package. It is used to debianize all the happstack packages
> which we upload to deb.seereason.com.
I played with cabal-debian and it seems quit
I try to incorporate knowledge about packaging haskell into the
cabal-debian package. It is used to debianize all the happstack packages
which we upload to deb.seereason.com.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:55 AM, Michael Alan Dorman <
mdor...@ironicdesign.com> wrote:
> Daniel Silverston
Daniel Silverstone writes:
> Mmm, I really should do that, shouldn't I? I guess I need to learn darcs
> first. Is there a single idealised tutorial on packaging haskell stuff, or
> should I just aggregate all the bits I have found thus-far?
If such a tutorial existed, I might be able to find ti
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 01:40:48AM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:45:02PM +, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> > Crud, and not packaged :-(
> >
> > Oh well, cabal here I come.
>
> Please help package it instead, except where things (such as reform-hsp)
> are a dependency pro
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:45:02PM +, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> Crud, and not packaged :-(
>
> Oh well, cabal here I come.
Please help package it instead, except where things (such as reform-hsp)
are a dependency problem.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-haskell-requ...@lists.debian.or
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 06:39:25PM -0500, Jeremy Shaw wrote:
> Nope. happstack-lite is a separate package:
>
> http://hackage.haskell.org/package/happstack-lite-7.3.0
Crud, and not packaged :-(
Oh well, cabal here I come.
Thanks for the help.
D.
--
Daniel Si
Nope. happstack-lite is a separate package:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/happstack-lite-7.3.0
- jeremy
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Daniel Silverstone
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 06:26:27PM -0500, Jeremy Shaw wrote:
>> The happstack package used to contain stuff.. but i
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 06:26:27PM -0500, Jeremy Shaw wrote:
> The happstack package used to contain stuff.. but it is more or less
> dead these days. The core of happstack is in happstack-server. The
That doesn't seem to contain Happstack.Lite though -- is that dead too?
D.
Hello,
The happstack package used to contain stuff.. but it is more or less
dead these days. The core of happstack is in happstack-server. The
core can then be supplemented using a bunch of addons like acid-state
(native Haskell DB), happstack-hsp (type-safe, compiled type HTML
templates), web
Hi all,
I was trying to play with happstack on Wheezy and noticed that the
libghc-happstack-dev package basically contains nothing of happstack.
Am I doing something wrong?
D.
--
Daniel Silverstone http://www.digital-scurf.org/
PGP mail accepted and encouraged
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear ftp-master,
the source packages
haskell-happstack-data
haskell-happstack-util
haskell-happstack-ixset
haskell-happstack-state
have been obsoleted by upstream, don’t build any more and and the
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear FTP team,
haskell-happstack-util now uses TemplateHaskell, which is not supported
on the above list of architectures any more. Hence the old binaries on
these architectures ought to be removed.
Thanks
+++ Giovanni Mascellani [Apr 21 11 00:35 ]:
> Hi John.
>
> As you may remember, I'm the Debian maintainer for gitit. We're doing a
> mass Haskell package update in Debian, and I just noticed that gitit
> still uses Happstack v. 0.5.x, while 6.0.0 is out.
>
> Do yo
Hi John.
As you may remember, I'm the Debian maintainer for gitit. We're doing a
mass Haskell package update in Debian, and I just noticed that gitit
still uses Happstack v. 0.5.x, while 6.0.0 is out.
Do you have any plan to update gitit to the new version? Could you give
an estimati
Il 17/07/2010 17:44, Jeremy Shaw ha scritto:
> Awesome work!
>
> Happstack 0.6 will add three new dependencies:
>
> - dlist
> - PSQueue
> - blaze-html
>
> So, if you have nothing else to do after gitit, you could start on
> those.. I hope to remove some pack
Awesome work!
Happstack 0.6 will add three new dependencies:
- dlist
- PSQueue
- blaze-html
So, if you have nothing else to do after gitit, you could start on
those.. I hope to remove some packages to make up for adding new ones,
but I am not sure what will be removed yet.
- jeremy
Il 17/07/2010 11:29, Joachim Breitner ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> Am Samstag, den 17.07.2010, 10:26 +0200 schrieb Giovanni Mascellani:
>> The last happstack Debian package entered the archive just today (though
>> it may still require a few hours to reach all the mirrors).
>
&g
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 17.07.2010, 10:26 +0200 schrieb Giovanni Mascellani:
> The last happstack Debian package entered the archive just today (though
> it may still require a few hours to reach all the mirrors).
thanks for tackling this beast.
Are you also going to package gitit? Ah, accord
Il 17/07/2010 10:26, Giovanni Mascellani ha scritto:
> I haven't done many test so far and I already know of some things that
> could be fixed (see the many Lintian warnings, for example); anyway,
> testing is open to anyone: if you're using Debian unstable and would
> like t
Hi all.
Sorry for the cross-posting, but I think this email is interesting for
both the lists.
The last happstack Debian package entered the archive just today (though
it may still require a few hours to reach all the mirrors).
I haven't done many test so far and I already know of some t
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 24.02.2009, 08:26 -0800 schrieb David Fox:
> Due to the module name change, HAppS and Happstack can co-exist, so I
> don't believe any migration is necessary.
Technically yes, but should they co-exist? It seems that Happstack
really replaces HAppS, and it doesn’
gt; interested), as I’ve been working with that a bit already.
>
> It seems that HAppS is obsoleted by Happstack now, which is a community
> maintenance fork. Is there any reason not to replace HAppS in Debian by
> Happsstack?
>
> And what would be a proper way to migrate?
> *
leted by Happstack now, which is a community
maintenance fork. Is there any reason not to replace HAppS in Debian by
Happsstack?
And what would be a proper way to migrate?
* Install empty transitional packages (with Depends: happstack) for
HAppS from the happs source packages or
* Put the tran
42 matches
Mail list logo
