Re: Haskell missingH licensing

2016-05-28 Thread John Goerzen
You are probably right. I have checked in this change to the git repo just now and it will be in the next release. John On 05/27/2016 06:16 PM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: >> I do note this in the LICENSE file. If someone wishes to use it under >> BSD-3, they would have to not use/include that partic

Re: Haskell missingH licensing

2016-05-27 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
> I do note this in the LICENSE file. If someone wishes to use it under > BSD-3, they would have to not use/include that particular work. > > That said, I wonder how many people are still using that file from this > location. Is there another CRC32 implementation in Hackage these days? Well, th

Re: Haskell missingH licensing

2016-05-27 Thread John Goerzen
Hi Dmitry, I do note this in the LICENSE file. If someone wishes to use it under BSD-3, they would have to not use/include that particular work. That said, I wonder how many people are still using that file from this location. Is there another CRC32 implementation in Hackage these days? John

Haskell missingH licensing

2016-05-24 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
Hello! Your haskell package 'missingH' claims to be licensed as BSD-3, but it contains files Data.CRC.Posix module, which is GPL licensed. As such, you can't distribute whole on terms, other then GPL. Can you please investigate issue? -- Accept: text/plain, text/x-diff Accept-Language: eo,en,ru