Kari Pahula wrote:
> I'd rather rename the current 2.x package as libghc6-quickcheck2-dev
> and add libghc6-quickcheck1-dev
How's progress going with this?
I see that on Unstable there is a libghc6-quickcheck2-dev and that
attempts to install libghc6-quickcheck-dev results in a message to
instal
Kari Pahula writes:
> Ouch, this is what I get for being overeager to update libraries.
> Parsec and now this, too. I'll revert Parsec to 2.x if that's
> necessary. Sorry about this.
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:42:47AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
>> I would advocate replacing libghc6-quickche
Kari Pahula wrote:
> Ouch, this is what I get for being overeager to update libraries.
> Parsec and now this, too. I'll revert Parsec to 2.x if that's
> necessary. Sorry about this.
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:42:47AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
>> I would advocate replacing libghc6-quickcheck
Ouch, this is what I get for being overeager to update libraries.
Parsec and now this, too. I'll revert Parsec to 2.x if that's
necessary. Sorry about this.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:42:47AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> I would advocate replacing libghc6-quickcheck-dev with the 1.x version
> to
Hi,
We seem to have an issue with QuickCheck in sid.
* libghc6-quickcheck-dev is 2.1
* GHC6 6.10 upstream ships with 1.x
* libhugs-quickcheck-bundled is also 1.x
This makes it impossible to write testpack in such a way that it:
* Works with the default QC in GHC 6.10 for non-Debian users
* W
