Hi,
Am Montag, den 17.02.2014, 07:10 + schrieb Jérémy Bobbio:
> > I don’t think the current time affects it, otherwise we would never have
> > any reproducibility. Same for the path: I sometimes built a library
> > locally that was sitting in NEW (uploaded by someone else), built my
> > packag
Joachim Breitner:
> Am Freitag, den 14.02.2014, 13:39 +0100 schrieb Jérémy Bobbio:
> > > Do you have the files somewhere? It would be most useful to compare the
> > > outputs of
> > > $ ghc --show-iface .hi
> > > and see where exactly the difference comes from. If there is low hanging
> > > fru
Hi Jérémy,
Am Freitag, den 14.02.2014, 13:39 +0100 schrieb Jérémy Bobbio:
> > Do you have the files somewhere? It would be most useful to compare the
> > outputs of
> > $ ghc --show-iface .hi
> > and see where exactly the difference comes from. If there is low hanging
> > fruit, I can probably
Joachim Breitner:
> > Good news is that in the set of 6887 source packages, there were many
> > Haskell packages which produced matching binary packages [2]:
> […]
> That’s not many comparted to the 600 we have...
177 packages with a name startig by haskell were tested. So yes,
progress can probab
Dear Jérémy,
Am Samstag, den 08.02.2014, 11:22 +0100 schrieb Jérémy Bobbio:
> Reproducible builds for Debian are very much a work-in-progress [1].
> With David Suárez, we've recently the build+rebuild of a large number of
> package to see how varying time and build path would affect their
> repro
Hi!
Reproducible builds for Debian are very much a work-in-progress [1].
With David Suárez, we've recently the build+rebuild of a large number of
package to see how varying time and build path would affect their
reproducibility.
Good news is that in the set of 6887 source packages, there were man
