Re: libghc6-gtk-dev for lucid and maverick

2010-10-05 Thread Christian Maeder
Am 05.10.2010 11:28, schrieb Iain Lane: > Hiya, > > On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 10:44:23AM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote: >> Am 04.10.2010 13:46, schrieb Joachim Breitner: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Am Samstag, den 02.10.2010, 16:47 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: I just had a look at the issue, backported

Re: libghc6-gtk-dev for lucid and maverick

2010-10-05 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 05.10.2010, 15:15 +0200 schrieb Christian Maeder: > Am 05.10.2010 11:28, schrieb Iain Lane: > > On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 10:44:23AM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote: > >> Am 04.10.2010 13:46, schrieb Joachim Breitner: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Am Samstag, den 02.10.2010, 16:47 +0200 s

Re: libghc6-gtk-dev for lucid and maverick

2010-10-05 Thread Iain Lane
Hiya, On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 10:44:23AM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote: Am 04.10.2010 13:46, schrieb Joachim Breitner: Hi, Am Samstag, den 02.10.2010, 16:47 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: I just had a look at the issue, backported the changes from 0.11.2 to 0.11.0 (we really don’t want to up

Re: libghc6-gtk-dev for lucid and maverick

2010-10-05 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi Christian, Am Dienstag, den 05.10.2010, 10:44 +0200 schrieb Christian Maeder: > Am 04.10.2010 13:46, schrieb Joachim Breitner: > > Hi, > > > > Am Samstag, den 02.10.2010, 16:47 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > >> I just had a look at the issue, backported the changes from 0.11.2 to > >> 0.11.

Re: libghc6-gtk-dev for lucid and maverick

2010-10-05 Thread Christian Maeder
Am 04.10.2010 13:46, schrieb Joachim Breitner: > Hi, > > Am Samstag, den 02.10.2010, 16:47 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: >> I just had a look at the issue, backported the changes from 0.11.2 to >> 0.11.0 (we really don’t want to update more than necessary at this stage >> of the freeze) but did

Re: libghc6-gtk-dev for lucid and maverick

2010-10-04 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Samstag, den 02.10.2010, 16:47 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > I just had a look at the issue, backported the changes from 0.11.2 to > 0.11.0 (we really don’t want to update more than necessary at this stage > of the freeze) but did not upload yet. The patch also changes the ABI, > so we’

Re: libghc6-gtk-dev for lucid and maverick

2010-10-02 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi everyone, I just had a look at the issue, backported the changes from 0.11.2 to 0.11.0 (we really don’t want to update more than necessary at this stage of the freeze) but did not upload yet. The patch also changes the ABI, so we’d need to rebuild all reverse dependencies (glade-0.11.0, gtksour

Re: [Gtk2hs-users] libghc6-gtk-dev for lucid and maverick

2010-09-23 Thread Axel Simon
Hi all, I'm not sure what the discussion is really about, but I'll try to clarify where I can. On 23.09.2010, at 14:43, Christian Maeder wrote: [adding gtk2hs-us...@lists.sourceforge.net] Am 23.09.2010 14:13, schrieb Joachim Breitner: [...] I just had a look at the output of $ diff -ur g

Re: libghc6-gtk-dev for lucid and maverick

2010-09-23 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 23.09.2010, 15:38 +0200 schrieb Christian Maeder: > P.S. The bug for debian is this one: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597837 > > (Should the source code be attached somehow?) generally, yes (just attach it to the submitting e-mail or later by a mai

Re: libghc6-gtk-dev for lucid and maverick

2010-09-23 Thread Christian Maeder
Am 23.09.2010 14:50, schrieb Andy Stewart: > Christian Maeder writes: > >> [adding gtk2hs-us...@lists.sourceforge.net] >> >> Am 23.09.2010 14:13, schrieb Joachim Breitner: >> [...] >> >>> I just had a look at the output of >>> $ diff -ur gtk-0.11.0/ gtk-0.11.2/ >>> and there many changes there (p

Re: libghc6-gtk-dev for lucid and maverick

2010-09-23 Thread Christian Maeder
[adding gtk2hs-us...@lists.sourceforge.net] Am 23.09.2010 14:13, schrieb Joachim Breitner: [...] > I just had a look at the output of > $ diff -ur gtk-0.11.0/ gtk-0.11.2/ > and there many changes there (plus bumped dependencies on glib, pango, > cairo). I have doubts that the release team will be

Re: libghc6-gtk-dev for lucid and maverick

2010-09-23 Thread Joachim Breitner
[Adding the mailing list back to CC] Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 23.09.2010, 11:57 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:36:27AM +0100, Iain Lane wrote: > >On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:23:04PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > >>>The usual way is to sync unmodified from Debian. In this ca

Re: libghc6-gtk-dev for lucid and maverick

2010-09-17 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi Christian, Am Freitag, den 17.09.2010, 15:57 +0200 schrieb Christian Maeder: > libghc6-gtk-dev for lucid is based > on the non-hackage gtk2hs release 0.10.1 > (that normally does not compile using ghc-6.12.1) > > Whereas libghc6-gtk-dev for maverick is based on > http://hackage.haskell.org/pac

libghc6-gtk-dev for lucid and maverick

2010-09-17 Thread Christian Maeder
Hi, libghc6-gtk-dev for lucid is based on the non-hackage gtk2hs release 0.10.1 (that normally does not compile using ghc-6.12.1) Whereas libghc6-gtk-dev for maverick is based on http://hackage.haskell.org/package/gtk-0.11.0 Unfortunately, due to a bug in gtk-0.11.0 our hets application does the