I don't have any practical experience with the C360, but the tulip chip is
a 10/100 ethernet controller. I've never seen any of those with an AUI
(which is 10 MB only), only MII which is the 100 Mb flavour of AUI. If the
machine really has a tulip chip and an AUI, it is something very unusual
I assume you tried eth1?
How about a AUI-10bT transciever? They can be gotten
fairly cheaply on Ebay and the like.
Also, are you using an AUI *crossover* cable? If not
you probably need a hub.
I'd suggest just getting a couple transcievers and
plugging the 10bT cables into a cheap hub. Makes it
a l
Hi,
I need to connect my C360 via AUI-port to another machine. Although I've set
the default port to AUI (boot-admin : lanconfig AUI) and the correct ip-address
(ifconfig
eth0), ping neither complains about beeing not able to reach the network,
nor makes any other output. I guess it uses the TP-p
Thanks for all the possibilities. I am running a 233MHz AMD K6 PC,
Debian. I'm not sure what the problem was, but I tried it once again
last night and it was working perfectly. Go figure. Perhaps I had a
screen session open in the background that was interfering, or maybe I
had a heavy load on my
Richard Hirst wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 01:31:18AM -0700, Christian Suder wrote:
> > Richard Hirst wrote:
> > > What are you running minicom on? If it's a 386 using an old UART with no
> > > FIFO then I'd suggest it just couldn't cope with bursts of data at 9.6K.
> > > Not very likely thou
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 01:31:18AM -0700, Christian Suder wrote:
> Richard Hirst wrote:
> > What are you running minicom on? If it's a 386 using an old UART with no
> > FIFO then I'd suggest it just couldn't cope with bursts of data at 9.6K.
> > Not very likely though. When you type things at the
Richard Hirst wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 06:19:34PM -0600, Hans Fugal wrote:
> > Alas, it didn't work. Actually, it did get minicom to the same level as
> > screen... now I'm getting the same thing in both. Here's cut&paste from
> > my xterminal to show what I'm getting.
> >
> > pyright.t-Pa
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 06:19:34PM -0600, Hans Fugal wrote:
> Alas, it didn't work. Actually, it did get minicom to the same level as
> screen... now I'm getting the same thing in both. Here's cut&paste from
> my xterminal to show what I'm getting.
>
> pyright.t-Packary. 1992.
basically, what we are trying to do is getting either lids or grsec to
work with a 2418-hppa kernel.
the first steps were with "normal" lids, which bombed at early stage
(shortly after init mounted the rootfs, even with security=0)
then i tried to make grsecurity patch fit the hppa kernel (but wi
9 matches
Mail list logo
