Re: palo / fdisk and debian installer

2002-08-05 Thread Carlos O'Donell
> > I'm having some difficulties allowing my hppa machine (B132L) to write a > valid IPL. Here is a snippet of the action from the console: > > Main Menu: Enter command > bo pri > Interact with IPL (Y, N, Q)?> n > > Booting... > Boot IO Dependent Code (IODC) revisiion 150 > > IPL error: bad IP

move from 0.9.3 to woody

2002-08-05 Thread Frank . Ickstadt
Hi there, I've installed woddy over an old 0.9.3 Linux installation and now it's working pretty fine. The developers did a very good work ! There are just two errors which came up during the installation. There are some errors with libgnome dependencies (sorry I can't remember the exact message

Re: palo / fdisk and debian installer

2002-08-05 Thread kenneth westelinck
Hi, Well, the install on my 712 is rather old. I've used the 0.9.2 ISO (which is way before debian-hppa 3.0) to do the job. I didn't have any problems during the install. Just read the installation manual very carefully. It might of course help to be a little more clear near the 6.3.1 section. Per

Re: palo / fdisk and debian installer

2002-08-05 Thread ste
On Mon, 5 Aug 2002 08:13:18 +0200 "kenneth westelinck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 8-§ > Hi, 8-§ > 8-§ > I think there's something wrong in your setup. According to the installation 8-§ > manual (http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/hppa/ch-partitioning.en.html) 8-§ > you'll need: 8-§ > -

Re: palo / fdisk and debian installer

2002-08-05 Thread kenneth westelinck
Hi, I think there's something wrong in your setup. According to the installation manual (http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/hppa/ch-partitioning.en.html) you'll need: - a partition for palo, bootable, about 16MB -> type F0, not mounted (I guess this will be /dev/sda1) - a partition to put your

Re: palo / fdisk and debian installer

2002-08-05 Thread Scott Edwards
On Mon, 5 Aug 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > There is a 16mb partition on /boot or /dev/sda1. > The fdisk type is F0 and has the boot flag active. I discovered what is happening. The installer almost implies that /boot and the palo partition are one in the same. When I ran palo, the filesyst