Re: rtc problems with grsecurity patch on hppa

2003-01-14 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 01:30:05AM +0100, Alexander Gabert wrote: > i will forward this message also to the debian hppa list, maybe they know, > if this code will be supported in the future or if it`s impossible, how > we can make it go without the CONFIG_RTC set to yes... CONFIG_RTC is not suppor

rtc problems with grsecurity patch on hppa

2003-01-14 Thread Alexander Gabert
hi, first of all, thanks for the reactivation. your patch merges cleanly into a 2.4.20 vanilla and i started to look forward how far we can get this time. but then, the first error... in your config script, you set CONFIG_RTC, which is reserved for the real time clock... your Config.in says:

Re: Please rebuild the lablgl package

2003-01-14 Thread LaMont Jones
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > En réponse à LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> The failure was that ocaml-3.06-1 wasn't available, and so they've >> been waiting for that to show up. > This is what I have understood from build logs. But they don't > seem to have retried? Aren't t

Re: [parisc-linux] new gcc-default for hppa

2003-01-14 Thread jsoe0708
>-- Original Message -- >Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:52:03 -0700 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: Randolph Chung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-hppa@lists.debian.org >Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] new gcc-default for hppa >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Grant Grundler) > > >On Tue, Jan 14,

Re: [parisc-linux] new gcc-default for hppa

2003-01-14 Thread Grant Grundler
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 07:57:01AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Linux Tulip driver version 0.9.15-pre12 (Aug 9, 2002) > tulip0: no phy info, aborting mtable build > tulip0: MII transceiver #1 config 1000 status 782d advertising 01e1. > eth0: Digital DS21143 Tulip rev 65 at 0xf00, 00:30:D3:01:

Re: [parisc-linux] new gcc-snapshot problem [was: new gcc-default for hppa]

2003-01-14 Thread jsoe0708
>-- Original Message -- >Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] new gcc-snapshot problem [was: new gcc-default >for hppa] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: "John David Anglin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > debian-hppa@lists.debian.org >Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:04:14 -050

Re: [parisc-linux] new gcc-snapshot problem [was: new gcc-default for hppa]

2003-01-14 Thread John David Anglin
> byte nslots; > __u8 short slot_tablelen; ^ As Willi said, the error is above and you will have to figure out or ask the maintainer what the intended type for slot_tablelen was in this struct. Look to see if there is a maximum size defined somewhere. >

Re: [parisc-linux] new gcc-snapshot problem [was: new gcc-default for hppa]

2003-01-14 Thread jsoe0708
> >> I have a look and in drivers/ide/ide-cd.h line 440 I found well: >> __u8 short slot_tabelen; >> >> Any idea? > >Look at the code after preprocessing with "-E" option. This will >show you the actual code where the fault occurs. > Hi Dave, Good idea and I do so for tree compiler still ins

Re: Please rebuild the lablgl package

2003-01-14 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Coud you please rebuild lablgl for ia64 and hppa.? > > It seems that autobuilders on these machines do > > not retry periodicaly when some packages failed to > > build. > > The failure was that

Re: Please rebuild the lablgl package

2003-01-14 Thread LaMont Jones
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Coud you please rebuild lablgl for ia64 and hppa.? > It seems that autobuilders on these machines do > not retry periodicaly when some packages failed to > build. The failure was that ocaml-3.06-1 wasn't available, and so they've been waiting for

Re: [parisc-linux] new gcc-snapshot problem [was: new gcc-default for hppa]

2003-01-14 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 08:54:22AM -0500, John David Anglin wrote: > > I have a look and in drivers/ide/ide-cd.h line 440 I found well: > > __u8 short slot_tabelen; > > > > Any idea? > > Look at the code after preprocessing with "-E" option. This will > show you the actual code where the fau

Re: [parisc-linux] new gcc-snapshot problem [was: new gcc-default for hppa]

2003-01-14 Thread John David Anglin
> I have a look and in drivers/ide/ide-cd.h line 440 I found well: > __u8 short slot_tabelen; > > Any idea? Look at the code after preprocessing with "-E" option. This will show you the actual code where the fault occurs. Dave -- J. David Anglin [EMAIL PROT

Please rebuild the lablgl package

2003-01-14 Thread Jérôme Marant
Hi, Coud you please rebuild lablgl for ia64 and hppa.? It seems that autobuilders on these machines do not retry periodicaly when some packages failed to build. Thanks in advance. Cheers, PS: please CC me on reply. -- Jérôme Marant

new gcc-snapshot problem [was: new gcc-default for hppa]

2003-01-14 Thread jsoe0708
>PS: Tommorrow I will try either snapshot or gcc-3.0? > I so try snapshot (named 20030105-1) and so set LD_LIBRARY_PATH and PATH as documented but compiling the kernel 2.4.20 failled with: gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.20-pa21/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict

Re: [parisc-linux] new gcc-default for hppa

2003-01-14 Thread jsoe0708
>On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 07:36:03PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Well as mentionned in another mail, I just compile the 2.4.20-pa21 with >> this new release and it always compile well, always boot well but also >as >> soon as a network connection is tempted the system still crash. >> >> And