On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 04:40:20PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Rpy is lagging on alpha and hppa. When 0.4.6-3 came out, both failed simply
> because they hadn't rebuilt the new R year. That is done, so please rebuild
> rpy.
> Without rpy, R cannot move to testing, which then holds up loads
On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 02:40 +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> pe, 2006-01-06 kello 17:30 -0700, Bdale Garbee kirjoitti:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin-Éric Racine) writes:
> >
> > >> To me it looks as if there were hardware problems.
> >
> > I don't see how you reach that conclusion?
>
> Pleas
On 1/6/06, Martin-Éric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Anyhow, given how hppa is already among the architectures that did not
> re-qualify for Etch, I propose that, from now on, hppa be ignored for
> deciding whether a package is considered valid for going into Testing.
I believe that
pe, 2006-01-06 kello 17:30 -0700, Bdale Garbee kirjoitti:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin-Éric Racine) writes:
>
> >> To me it looks as if there were hardware problems.
>
> I don't see how you reach that conclusion?
Please read and quote carefully.
That sentence was by Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin-Éric Racine) writes:
>> To me it looks as if there were hardware problems.
I don't see how you reach that conclusion?
>> /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-base.postinst: line 678: update-language: command
>> not found
Reading tetex-base.postinst, update-language is being cal
Rpy is lagging on alpha and hppa. When 0.4.6-3 came out, both failed simply
because they hadn't rebuilt the new R year. That is done, so please rebuild
rpy.
Without rpy, R cannot move to testing, which then holds up loads of little
packages depending on R (binary package r-base-core).
If I over
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:05:31PM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 39954 Jan 6 20:47 planner-dev_0.13-4_hppa.deb
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 801 Jan 6 20:47 planner_0.13-4_hppa.changes
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2167556 Jan 6 20:47 planner_0.13-4_hppa.deb
>
> I built it j
On 1/6/06, Martin-Éric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> pe, 2006-01-06 kello 11:51 -0500, Kyle McMartin kirjoitti:
> Well, this is the second time that installation of tetex fails on hppa.
> According to the tetex maintainer, everything is kosher on his side, so
> this brings the question why i
pe, 2006-01-06 kello 11:51 -0500, Kyle McMartin kirjoitti:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:18:38PM +0200, Martin-?ric Racine wrote:
> > Anyhow, given how hppa is already among the architectures that did not
> > re-qualify for Etch, I propose that, from now on, hppa be ignored for
> > deciding whether
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 03:54:40AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Which gcc-X.Y-hppa64 variants are still needed for Debian sid/etch?
> Currently compilers are built for 3.3, 3.4, 4.0 and 4.1, the latter
> one for experimental. Is it time to drop some of these?
>
Please don't remove gcc-3.4-hppa64
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 03:54:40AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Which gcc-X.Y-hppa64 variants are still needed for Debian sid/etch?
> Currently compilers are built for 3.3, 3.4, 4.0 and 4.1, the latter
> one for experimental. Is it time to drop some of these?
What James said. I'm also still usin
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:18:38PM +0200, Martin-?ric Racine wrote:
> Anyhow, given how hppa is already among the architectures that did not
> re-qualify for Etch, I propose that, from now on, hppa be ignored for
> deciding whether a package is considered valid for going into Testing.
>
Uhm. You'r
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 03:54 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Which gcc-X.Y-hppa64 variants are still needed for Debian sid/etch?
> Currently compilers are built for 3.3, 3.4, 4.0 and 4.1, the latter
> one for experimental. Is it time to drop some of these?
We use the hppa64 compilers only for genera
pe, 2005-12-23 kello 17:23 +0100, Frank Küster kirjoitti:
> Hi Lamont, hi Debian admins,
>
> during the last weeks there were a couple of FTBFS cases on sarti, the
> hppa buildd, which point to severe problems on that machine. The things
> that happened did only happen on this single buildd, but
14 matches
Mail list logo
