> There isn't a lot of info in #342545. However, I suspect from the
> following comment
>
> > It would be nice if somebody fluent with hppa assembly can tell us if
>
> > fldw -10(,sp),fr23
>
> that this is the same bug as reported here:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20754
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 01:05:11AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Grant, thank you for your work to date on this bug. (BTW, it would be
> > helpful if you would follow up to bug #342545 on libgcc2, instead of bug
> > #341675 which is filed against just one of the many packages affected by
> >
> On 1/7/06, Helge Deller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > BTW, what does it take to drop hppa64-compiler in favour of a "-m64"
> > compiler flag (as on x86_64) to hppa-gcc as well ?
>
> This is probably impossible for the simple reason that the 64bit
> flavour of hppa gcc can only build kernel
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 01:05:11AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Grant, thank you for your work to date on this bug. (BTW, it would be
> helpful if you would follow up to bug #342545 on libgcc2, instead of bug
> #341675 which is filed against just one of the many packages affected by
> it).
Stev
> On Friday 06 January 2006 20:27, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 03:54:40AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > Which gcc-X.Y-hppa64 variants are still needed for Debian sid/etch?
> > > Currently compilers are built for 3.3, 3.4, 4.0 and 4.1, the latter
> > > one for experimental.
On 1/7/06, Helge Deller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> BTW, what does it take to drop hppa64-compiler in favour of a "-m64" compiler
> flag (as on x86_64) to hppa-gcc as well ?
This is probably impossible for the simple reason that the 64bit
flavour of hppa gcc can only build kernels: we don't ha
On Friday 06 January 2006 20:27, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 03:54:40AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Which gcc-X.Y-hppa64 variants are still needed for Debian sid/etch?
> > Currently compilers are built for 3.3, 3.4, 4.0 and 4.1, the latter
> > one for experimental. Is it tim
Grant, thank you for your work to date on this bug. (BTW, it would be
helpful if you would follow up to bug #342545 on libgcc2, instead of bug
#341675 which is filed against just one of the many packages affected by
it).
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem from the bug log as though much progress is
b
8 matches
Mail list logo
