* Kyle McMartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-05 15:52]:
> > For hppa an update to current 2.6.15 is a requirement for inclusion in the
> > release.
> Err, what's wrong with 2.6.15-4 on hppa? It seems to have built fine.
udebs...
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
[trimmed down the CC-list]
On 2/5/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ARCHITECTURE STATUS
> ===
> Besides not having up-to-date 2.6 kernel udebs, hppa and m68k are
> currently not installable in either testing or unstable.
> Reason is FTBFS problems for packages in base whi
On Sunday 05 February 2006 22:36, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> Could you please elaborate? That's the first time I hear about base
> packages FTBFS on hppa.
aptitude has been dep-waiting on a fix for #341675 (cppunit). This
resulted in dependencies not being satisfied for new installations.
However,
On Sunday 05 February 2006 21:52, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 09:34:32PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Two ports are still on older 2.6 kernel versions: hppa (2.6.14) and
> > m68k (2.6.12).
> > For hppa an update to current 2.6.15 is a requirement for inclusion
> > in the release.
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 09:34:32PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Two ports are still on older 2.6 kernel versions: hppa (2.6.14) and m68k
> (2.6.12).
> For hppa an update to current 2.6.15 is a requirement for inclusion in the
> release.
> For m68k AFAICT the 2.6 kernel udebs are not actually used ye
Almost all packages targeted for Beta2 have now been uploaded and so far
we've not seen any regressions.
The only package that currently looks like it will need another upload is
partman-auto-lvm in which some bugs were discovered during testing.
I will start moving udebs to testing this week,
6 matches
Mail list logo
