Interesting, I wasn't aware that this was a requirement of a partial
upgrade. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I'll go back and
have a look at your previous proposal.
The static initializer are (re-)exposed by some headers like
X11/Xthreads.h, directfb/direct/modules.h.
There is no
[Changing debian-bsd to debian-glibc, probably more appropriate to
discuss about the internal glibc code ;-)]
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:51:52PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Petr Salingerpetr.salin...@seznam.cz wrote:
Hello,
Hello Petr!
may I ask you
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Andreas Bartha...@not.so.argh.org wrote:
Or are you simply asking the hppa porters to be more active in filing
FTBFS bugs against packages after build failures?
If they would do that, that might be quite helpful to distinguish
between hppa issue and package
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Marc
Brockschmidtm...@marcbrockschmidt.de wrote:
As announced on dda [RT1], we want to get an impression when releasing
Squeeze is feasible. We have proposed a (quite ambitious) freeze in December
2009, and some developers have noted that their planned changes
* Carlos O'Donell (car...@systemhalted.org) [090819 14:56]:
I didn't know vlc, xmms2, and xmp were not building. I'll add them to
my list and look over the failures. I don't know how to get visibility
into what's failing for hppa.
Basically, by e.g. checking the testing excuse page which
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Andreas Bartha...@not.so.argh.org wrote:
* Carlos O'Donell (car...@systemhalted.org) [090819 14:56]:
I didn't know vlc, xmms2, and xmp were not building. I'll add them to
my list and look over the failures. I don't know how to get visibility
into what's failing
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Frans Popelen...@planet.nl wrote:
Carlos O'Donell wrote:
I didn't know vlc, xmms2, and xmp were not building. I'll add them to
my list and look over the failures. I don't know how to get visibility
into what's failing for hppa.
Do you know of:
So I should be looking for packages in the Failed state that say
(N-1)/N (fails only on hppa)?
Yes, especially when N is already high (i.e. most arches have built the
package). Packages with (N-2)/N or even (N-3) are probably also worth
looking at but can be given lower priority.
And
8 matches
Mail list logo
