On 03-27 12:19, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> On lördagen den 26 mars 2011, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 08:29:11PM +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Some of the tests of lsh-utils failed on hppa, alpha, and s390
> > > (https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=
On lördagen den 26 mars 2011, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 08:29:11PM +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Some of the tests of lsh-utils failed on hppa, alpha, and s390
> > (https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lsh-utils) after I
> > enabled them, the reason bei
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 08:29:11PM +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Some of the tests of lsh-utils failed on hppa, alpha, and s390
> (https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lsh-utils) after I enabled
> them, the reason being that they expect $USER or $LOGNAME to be set. Is there
Hi!
Some of the tests of lsh-utils failed on hppa, alpha, and s390
(https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lsh-utils) after I enabled
them, the reason being that they expect $USER or $LOGNAME to be set. Is there
some particular reason that this is the case (shouldn't one expect these
v
4 matches
Mail list logo