Re: [parisc-linux] linux32 personality & config.guess

2007-09-04 Thread John David Anglin
> With recent 64bit kernels linux32 seems to work, > > $ linux32 uname -m > parisc > > but > > $ linux32 /usr/share/misc/config.guess > hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu > > which seems to break some configury only knowing about hppa and > hppa64. Is config.guess correct, and should configure scripts b

Re: [parisc-linux] linux32 personality & config.guess

2007-09-06 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 04 September 2007, John David Anglin wrote: > With respect to hppa variants, this is a hopeless mess and I don't > believe this can be fixed. For example, libgmp treats hppa2.0w as > indicating a 64-bit runtime. I'm sure you have hit this. i think gmp is just plain broken in this resp

Re: [parisc-linux] linux32 personality & config.guess

2007-09-06 Thread Matthias Klose
John David Anglin writes: > believe this can be fixed. For example, libgmp treats hppa2.0w as > indicating a 64-bit runtime. I'm sure you have hit this. no python's internal copy of libffi :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI

Re: [parisc-linux] linux32 personality & config.guess

2007-09-06 Thread Thibaut VARENE
On 9/6/07, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 04 September 2007, John David Anglin wrote: > > Nominally, the first part of the target string represents the > > architecture of the kernel, and not the userspace architecture. > > This is not sufficient to configure runtime applic

Re: [parisc-linux] linux32 personality & config.guess

2007-09-06 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 06 September 2007, Thibaut VARENE wrote: > On 9/6/07, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 04 September 2007, John David Anglin wrote: > > > Nominally, the first part of the target string represents the > > > architecture of the kernel, and not the userspace architec

Re: [parisc-linux] linux32 personality & config.guess

2007-09-06 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 06 September 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 06 September 2007, Thibaut VARENE wrote: > > On 9/6/07, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tuesday 04 September 2007, John David Anglin wrote: > > > > Nominally, the first part of the target string represents the > >

Re: [parisc-linux] linux32 personality & config.guess

2007-09-06 Thread John David Anglin
> > Nominally, the first part of the target string represents the > > architecture of the kernel, and not the userspace architecture. > > This is not sufficient to configure runtime applications when multiple > > architectures are supported by one kernel. > > i'm not terribly familiar with the bre

Re: [parisc-linux] linux32 personality & config.guess

2007-09-06 Thread John David Anglin
> i didnt misunderstand anything > > i'm stating that an autotool based package should treat all hppa2.0 hosts as > 32bit userland which is exactly what gmp does not do Right. Dave -- J. David Anglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] National Research Council of Canada

Re: [parisc-linux] linux32 personality & config.guess

2007-09-06 Thread John David Anglin
> Seems you misunderstood jda's above comment. We do not have a 64bit > userland on hppa. the 'hppa64' part of the target string represents > the architecture of the /kernel/. 64bit kernels run a 32bit userland, > hence hppa64-linux should be treated (so far) as hppa-linux. No, the architecture po

Re: [parisc-linux] linux32 personality & config.guess

2007-09-06 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 04:33:00PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: > This has arisen on the PA since we have separate 32 and 64 bit tools. > In other architectures, a compiler flag is used to select the output > architecture. Any interest in doing the unification of 32 and 64-bit? ISTR Jeff Baile

Re: [parisc-linux] linux32 personality & config.guess

2007-09-06 Thread John David Anglin
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 04:33:00PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: > > This has arisen on the PA since we have separate 32 and 64 bit tools. > > In other architectures, a compiler flag is used to select the output > > architecture. > > Any interest in doing the unification of 32 and 64-bit? IST

Re: [parisc-linux] linux32 personality & config.guess

2007-09-06 Thread Jeff Bailey
On 06/09/07, Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 04:33:00PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: > > This has arisen on the PA since we have separate 32 and 64 bit tools. > > In other architectures, a compiler flag is used to select the output > > architecture. > > Any in

Re: [parisc-linux] linux32 personality & config.guess

2007-09-07 Thread Carlos O'Donell
On 9/6/07, John David Anglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 04:33:00PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: > The reality is that a lot of work has been needed to keep up with > the rapid changes occuring in the middle of GCC and it has been > difficult to keep things from regres

Re: [parisc-linux] linux32 personality & config.guess

2007-09-10 Thread LaMont Jones
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 03:11:37PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > i'm not terribly familiar with the breadth of the parisc family, but isnt > 64bit only available with 2.0 ? so it'd be pretty clean on Linux to say: > hppa64-*-linux-* means 64bit userland, everything else is 32bit Also, with the

Re: [parisc-linux] linux32 personality & config.guess

2007-09-10 Thread John David Anglin
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 03:11:37PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i'm not terribly familiar with the breadth of the parisc family, but isnt > > 64bit only available with 2.0 ? so it'd be pretty clean on Linux to say: > > hppa64-*-linux-* means 64bit userland, everything else is 32bit > > Al