Boost build failure on hppa

2009-05-11 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 01:16:05PM +0200, Adeodato Sim?? wrote: > boost1.38 managed to get built on mips in the second try after I gave it > back, but it failed again on hppa; any insight on that? No insight here. From the build log for 1.38.0-6 [1], I can see that four "copy" targets failed, e.

Re: Boost build failure on hppa

2009-05-13 Thread Domenico Andreoli
hi, On 5/12/09, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > No other arch failed to copy these files, and the previous build (-5) > on hppa [2] exhibited no such trouble. The only difference between > -5 and -6 is a debian/control change to a conflicts specification. I > blame the build daemon. Can someon

Re: Boost build failure on hppa

2009-05-13 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 05:37:36PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > hi, > > On 5/12/09, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > > > No other arch failed to copy these files, and the previous build (-5) > > on hppa [2] exhibited no such trouble. The only difference between > > -5 and -6 is a debian/contr

Re: Boost build failure on hppa

2009-05-16 Thread Philipp Kern
[ Please Cc me as I'm not subscribed to the list. ] On 2009-05-14, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 05:37:36PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: >> On 5/12/09, Steve M. Robbins wrote: >> > >> > No other arch failed to copy these files, and the previous build (-5) >> > on hppa [2

Re: Boost build failure on hppa

2009-05-16 Thread Adeodato Simó
+ Steve M. Robbins (Wed, 13 May 2009 20:12:32 -0500): > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 05:37:36PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > > hi, > > On 5/12/09, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > > No other arch failed to copy these files, and the previous build (-5) > > > on hppa [2] exhibited no such trouble.

Re: Boost build failure on hppa

2009-05-17 Thread Grant Grundler
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 02:53:41PM +, Philipp Kern wrote: > [ Please Cc me as I'm not subscribed to the list. ] > > On 2009-05-14, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 05:37:36PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > >> On 5/12/09, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > >> > > >> > No other a