Hi Frans,
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 08:17:50AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
The 2.6.30-1-parisc64-smp kernel fails to boot on my J5600 system.
The non-smp kernel does boot correctly and the oops also indicates
an smp problem.
i found this old message with three magic words: parisc64, smp, j5600.
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 04:56:00 am Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 18 December 2009, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 08:17:50AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
The 2.6.30-1-parisc64-smp kernel fails to boot on my J5600 system.
The non-smp kernel does boot correctly and the oops also
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.30-3
Severity: important
The 2.6.30-1-parisc64-smp kernel fails to boot on my J5600 system.
The non-smp kernel does boot correctly and the oops also indicates
an smp problem.
Boot log from serial console attached.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
* Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl [2009-07-31 08:17]:
The 2.6.30-1-parisc64-smp kernel fails to boot on my J5600 system.
The non-smp kernel does boot correctly and the oops also indicates
an smp problem.
Copying debian-h...@lists.debian.org...
Boot log from serial console attached.
-- System
Hmm. The Badness at smp.c warning isn't new of course. That was also
there with .24 and .26 (the last working kernel I have).
What is new is that the boot now hangs immediately after that point.
I also note the following in the boot messages:
unwind_init: start = 0x404b9144, end = 0x404e5204,
On Friday 31 July 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
Hmm. The Badness at smp.c warning isn't new of course. That was also
there with .24 and .26 (the last working kernel I have).
What is new is that the boot now hangs immediately after that point.
Whatever the problem is, it looks to be solved in
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Frans Popelen...@planet.nl wrote:
On Friday 31 July 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
Hmm. The Badness at smp.c warning isn't new of course. That was also
there with .24 and .26 (the last working kernel I have).
What is new is that the boot now hangs immediately after
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Frans Popelen...@planet.nl wrote:
On Friday 31 July 2009, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
I'm glad this is fixed in 2.6.31-rc4, do you need any more help from
the porters?
Well, it might be nice if the responsible change(s) could be identified.
Possibly they could be
8 matches
Mail list logo