Only 2 port maintainers?

2007-10-26 Thread Luk Claes
Hi Please add yourself to [0] if you're actively working on hppa issues. Feel free to complete the page for the other criteria too. Cheers Luk [0] http://wiki.debian.org/hppaLennyReleaseRecertification -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Re: Only 2 port maintainers?

2007-10-27 Thread Grant Grundler
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 10:58:55AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Please add yourself to [0] if you're actively working on hppa issues. Feel > free to complete the page for the other criteria too. > > Cheers > > Luk > > [0] http://wiki.debian.org/hppaLennyReleaseRecertification Can anyone else sign up

Re: Only 2 port maintainers?

2007-10-28 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 12:25:50AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote: > In any case, if someone could add willy and lamont to both > the list of maintainers and list of folks who can provide access > to remote hppa HW (running debian of course), that would be great. > I'd list myself as the 5th person (t

Re: Only 2 port maintainers?

2007-10-28 Thread Luk Claes
Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 12:25:50AM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote: >> In any case, if someone could add willy and lamont to both >> the list of maintainers and list of folks who can provide access >> to remote hppa HW (running debian of course), that would be great. >> I'd list

Re: Only 2 port maintainers?

2007-10-29 Thread Luk Claes
Grant Grundler wrote: On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 10:58:55AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: Please add yourself to [0] if you're actively working on hppa issues. Feel free to complete the page for the other criteria too. Cheers Luk [0] http://wiki.debian.org/hppaLennyReleaseRecertification Can anyone

Re: Only 2 port maintainers?

2007-10-29 Thread Luk Claes
Matthew Wilcox wrote: On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 04:32:51PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: Matthew Wilcox wrote: I'm not volunteering. I have no motivation to work on Debian in any meaningful manner. I long ago lost common cause with the hard-core Debian folks who value ideological purity over providin

Re: Only 2 port maintainers?

2007-10-29 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 04:32:51PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > I'm not volunteering. I have no motivation to work on Debian in any > > meaningful manner. I long ago lost common cause with the hard-core > > Debian folks who value ideological purity over providing a useful s

Re: Only 2 port maintainers?

2007-12-27 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 10:58:55AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Hi Hi, > Please add yourself to [0] if you're actively working on hppa issues. Feel > free to complete the page for the other criteria too. I have a working hppa and sometimes I build packages left behind by buildd. I have not specifi

Re: Only 2 port maintainers?

2007-12-27 Thread Luk Claes
Domenico Andreoli wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 10:58:55AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >> Hi > > Hi, > >> Please add yourself to [0] if you're actively working on hppa issues. Feel >> free to complete the page for the other criteria too. > > I have a working hppa and sometimes I build packages l

Re: Only 2 port maintainers?

2007-12-28 Thread Grant Grundler
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 01:56:25AM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 10:58:55AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > Hi > > Hi, > > > Please add yourself to [0] if you're actively working on hppa issues. Feel > > free to complete the page for the other criteria too. > > I have a

Re: Only 2 port maintainers?

2007-12-28 Thread Thibaut VARENE
On Dec 28, 2007 9:34 AM, Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > glibc/toolchain also have a few people looking at it. But if you can > remind "us" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) kernel stuff is broken, and Err, Grant mixed up the old and the new mailing list address ;) The correct address is [EMAIL PR

Re: Only 2 port maintainers?

2007-12-29 Thread Grant Grundler
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 11:37:27AM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote: > On Dec 28, 2007 9:34 AM, Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > glibc/toolchain also have a few people looking at it. But if you can > > remind "us" ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) kernel stuff is broken, and > > Err, Grant mixed up t