On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 12:17:04PM -0500, Jim Buttafuoco wrote:
>
>
> same, Do you think it's the hardware?
*sigh*. Based on comments from Greg Hughes...I'd think not.
> I wonder if a register is getting overwritten with normal processing
> but gdb is somehow saving it.
That's possible but
@lists.debian.org
Sent: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:36:26 -0700
Subject: Re: Postgresql 8.0.1
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:15:54AM -0500, Jim Buttafuoco wrote:
> > This is really strange. If I run postgresql under gdb and break in
> > the float4div function then I get the correct answer.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:15:54AM -0500, Jim Buttafuoco wrote:
> This is really strange. If I run postgresql under gdb and break in
> the float4div function then I get the correct answer. If I remove
> the break point then I get the wrong answer.
> I am thinking I need to do the kernel upgrade y
Subject: Re: Postgresql 8.0.1
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:34:51PM -0500, Jim Buttafuoco wrote:
> > Grant,
> >
> > yes, I will rebuild the kernel. which version and is there a tar file for
> > it?
>
> http://cvs.parisc-linux.org/download/linux-2.6/
>
> G
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 02:09:46PM -0500, Jim Buttafuoco wrote:
> Doing some more digging on this issue, I have found that even though
> _GNU_SOURCE is defined on my gcc command line the
> macro __USE_ISOC99 (from /usr/include/features.h) doesn't get set. without
> this macro set (like it is on
>
roken
system.
Jim
-- Original Message ---
From: Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jim Buttafuoco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: debian-hppa@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:47:49 -0700
Subject: Re: Postgresql 8.0.1
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:34:51PM -0500,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:34:51PM -0500, Jim Buttafuoco wrote:
> Grant,
>
> yes, I will rebuild the kernel. which version and is there a tar file for it?
http://cvs.parisc-linux.org/download/linux-2.6/
Grab the latest 2.6.11-pa2 tarball here.
thanks,
grant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
n.org
Sent: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:36:28 -0700
Subject: Re: Postgresql 8.0.1
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:17:25PM -0500, Hughes, Gregory Mark wrote:
> > Jim,
> >
> > I've been working with PA-RISC processors from the days of the 710. I
> > have never seen any processor
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 04:17:25PM -0500, Hughes, Gregory Mark wrote:
> Jim,
>
> I've been working with PA-RISC processors from the days of the 710. I
> have never seen any processor related difference in floating point
> results using PA1.1 instructions. There is the possibility of a
> hardware
x 9 on the 710 (disk died), as I would like to give it a
try also
Jim
-- Original Message ---
From: "Hughes, Gregory Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:17:25 -0500
Subject: RE: Postgresql 8.0.1
> Jim,
>
>
; From: Jim Buttafuoco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 2:03 PM
> To: Carlos O'Donell
> Cc: debian-hppa@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Postgresql 8.0.1
>
> ok, you DO think it' the hardware. I will have the
> postgresql people
s O'Donell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jim Buttafuoco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: debian-hppa@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:48:55 -0500
Subject: Re: Postgresql 8.0.1
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 03:43:27PM -0500, Jim Buttafuoco wrote:
> > my software matches y
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 03:43:27PM -0500, Jim Buttafuoco wrote:
> my software matches yours below. Do you think it could be the
> hardware floating point in this systems. It is a 710 and I think is
> was made in the early 90's. I just find is odd that 7.4.X works fine.
> Any chance you could mak
mpile?
Thanks for your help
Jim
-- Original Message ---
From: "Carlos O'Donell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jim Buttafuoco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: debian-hppa@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:35:22 -0500
Subject: Re: Postgresql 8.0.1
> On Tue, Ma
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 05:21:54PM -0500, Jim Buttafuoco wrote:
> here is what I do.
>
> 1. Download postgresql 8.0.1 source from ftp.postgresql.org
> 2. un tar package
> 3. ./configure --enable-debug --with-pgport= --prefix=/usr/local/pgsql
>
> change --prefix to w
here is what I do.
1. Download postgresql 8.0.1 source from ftp.postgresql.org
2. un tar package
3. ./configure --enable-debug --with-pgport= --prefix=/usr/local/pgsql
change --prefix to where ever you want to install
4. make
5. make check
with step 5 you will see failures.
let me
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 03:18:44PM -0500, Jim Buttafuoco wrote:
> yes I looked and talked to Tom Lane about it. He believes its the
> platform/compile NOT postgresql. I disagree with his opinion as
> postgresql 7.4.X passes ALL tests. The float4 test are failing and I
> narrowed it down to the h
rg
Sent: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:33:28 -0500
Subject: Re: Postgresql 8.0.1
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 08:17:10PM -0500, Jim Buttafuoco wrote:
> > yes, I run it on i386, arm , mips, mipssel, sparc and alpha.
>
> Okay, what tests are failing? Have you looked into possible reasons?
> Or r
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 08:17:10PM -0500, Jim Buttafuoco wrote:
> yes, I run it on i386, arm , mips, mipssel, sparc and alpha.
Okay, what tests are failing? Have you looked into possible reasons?
Or rather were you hoping that someone had it all working :)
c.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
yes, I run it on i386, arm , mips, mipssel, sparc and alpha.
-- Original Message ---
From: "Carlos O'Donell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jim Buttafuoco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: debian-hppa@lists.debian.org
Sent: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 14:48:51 -0500
Subject: Re:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 11:42:49AM -0500, Jim Buttafuoco wrote:
> I am having some problems running the postgresql 8.0.1 regression test
> on my hppa debian sarge (710 and 735/99) systems. Postgresql 7.4.6
> passes 100% of the regress tests. Has anyone compiled 8.0.1 and run
> th
I am having some problems running the postgresql 8.0.1 regression test on my
hppa debian sarge (710 and 735/99) systems.
Postgresql 7.4.6 passes 100% of the regress tests. Has anyone compiled 8.0.1
and run the regression tests?
Please let me know
Thanks
Jim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
22 matches
Mail list logo
