Re: Have my PA8800 back online... (serial port missing on v4.14)

2017-12-19 Thread Andy Shevchenko
offer to accept this patch, but maybe we are able > > > to come up with another patch which simply hides those unsupported > > > devices (serial port and ATI graphics card device on the Diva > > > card). > > > I posted a proposed patch here: > > > h

Re: Have my PA8800 back online... (serial port missing on v4.14)

2017-12-18 Thread Helge Deller
eck was inside the function >> serial_pci_guess_board() >> and if (ent->driver_data != pbn_default) the pci serial port got >> registered >> and initialized *even* if it's *not* of class SERIAL or MODEM. > > Ah, okay, it explains indeed. > Though PCI devices with wrong class sho

Re: Have my PA8800 back online... (serial port missing on v4.14)

2017-12-13 Thread Andy Shevchenko
pbn_default) the pci serial port got > registered > and initialized *even* if it's *not* of class SERIAL or MODEM. Ah, okay, it explains indeed. Though PCI devices with wrong class should have their own quirks for my p.o.v. > > (Of course, I agree this is regression and needs to be

Re: Have my PA8800 back online... (serial port missing on v4.14)

2017-12-12 Thread Helge Deller
r kernels. > >>>> Thus the kernel will talk to the non-existant serial port at >>>> 0xf4050010 instead of 0xf405. > > Wait, from this sentence you actually confirm that patch removes *non- > existant* ports. > > Can you elaborate what

Re: Have my PA8800 back online... (serial port missing on v4.14)

2017-12-11 Thread Andy Shevchenko
rts which were detected in > > > earlier kernels. > > > Thus the kernel will talk to the non-existant serial port at > > > 0xf4050010 instead of 0xf405. Wait, from this sentence you actually confirm that patch removes *non- existant* ports

Re: Have my PA8800 back online... (serial port missing on v4.14)

2017-12-08 Thread Helge Deller
he kernel will talk to the non-existant serial port at > > 0xf4050010 instead of 0xf405. > > > > 4.13: > > [ 28.882849] Serial: 8250/16550 driver, 4 ports, IRQ sharing enabled > > [ 28.898720] :e0:01.0: ttyS0 at MMIO 0xfff

RE: Serial port problem.

2003-06-16 Thread Joel Soete
>-- Original Message -- >From: Eric Huiban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: debian-hppa@lists.debian.org >Subject: Serial port problem. >Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 23:54:30 +0200 > > >Hi all, I just need to install an 'old' modem (USR Sportster V34) on a freshly ins

Serial port problem.

2003-06-15 Thread Eric Huiban
Hi all, I just need to install an 'old' modem (USR Sportster V34) on a freshly installed HP 9000/730. Using minicom i only managed to communicate with the modem up to 19200bps. I'm using ttyS0 as backup console port and ttyS1 as modem port. here is the content of my serial.conf generated during

Re: Serial port...

2002-12-03 Thread Grant Grundler
Eric wrote: > setserial -a give me: > > /dev/ttyS1, Line 1, Uart: 16550A, Port: 0x, IRQ: 121 > Baud_base: 454545 close_delay:50 divisor: 0 > closing_wait: 3000 > Flags: spd_normal 459 printf("%s uart %s port 0x%.4x irq %d baud_base %d", device, 460

Re: Serial port and network

2002-12-02 Thread Eric
Thanks a lot to take time to answer me. I answer you in the message... > > If I try to do: > > > setserial -a /dev/ttyS1 baud_base 38400 > > As far as I know these machines support 9600 baud only ... Ok. I try now with 9600. There is a 16550 on the board. So... should go up to 115200? But f

Serial port...

2002-12-01 Thread Eric
Hi, If I try to do: setserial -a /dev/ttyS1 baud_base 38400 I receive an error: "Cannot set serial info: Address already in use" setserial -a give me: /dev/ttyS1, Line 1, Uart: 16550A, Port: 0x, IRQ: 121 Baud_base: 454545 close_delay:50 divisor: 0 closing_wait: 3000 Flags: spd_normal My