On 07.12.2009 14:36, Onkar Shinde wrote:
Hi,
java3d currently fails to build on hppa because it uses some sun
specific APIs and default-jdk is GCJ on hppa. A solution for this
could be to use openjdk-6-jdk build-dep instead of default-jdk. But
the problem is that there are no openjdk-* packages
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 07.12.2009 14:36, Onkar Shinde wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> java3d currently fails to build on hppa because it uses some sun
>> specific APIs and default-jdk is GCJ on hppa. A solution for this
>> could be to use openjdk-6-jdk build-dep instead
> openjdk builds on hppa, but doesn't run (yet). Andrew Haley once debugged it
> and found out at least one things which would need to be fixed: the
> assumption in the C++ interpreter that the stack always grows downwards, and
> not upwards as on hppa.
>
> please could one of the hotspot devel
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
>> please could one of the hotspot developers sched some light on this, how
>> easy this might to be fix, and if there are other assumptions?
>
> Could you give more detail on where exactly the direction of growth is being
> assumed? I know t
On 05.01.2010 19:13, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
openjdk builds on hppa, but doesn't run (yet). Andrew Haley once debugged it
and found out at least one things which would need to be fixed: the assumption
in the C++ interpreter that the stack always grows downwards, and not upwards
as on hppa.
pleas
Tom Rodriguez wrote:
> Someone wrote:
> > openjdk builds on hppa, but doesn't run (yet). Andrew Haley once
> > debugged it and found out at least one things which would need to
> > be fixed: the assumption in the C++ interpreter that the stack
> > always grows downwards, and not upwards as on hppa.
> I'm not 100% sure what the correct value of this would be for HPPA.
> The ABI stack grows upwards, but the stack Zero maintains still grows
> downwards. If interpreter_frame_expression_stack_direction is used
> for both of these stacks then something will need changing (either a
> separate acces
No I didn't see it. If it was only on the icedtea list then I wouldn't have
seen it as hotspot-dev is the only one of these aliases that I'm on. By the
way, I restored the other aliases to my reply so they would get it too. So the
computation of the location of the guard pages is wrong becaus
On 01/06/2010 05:26 PM, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
> No I didn't see it. If it was only on the icedtea list then I
> wouldn't have seen it as hotspot-dev is the only one of these
> aliases that I'm on.
Oh darn, my mistake. The shiny new Reply List button on Thunderbird 3
didn't quite do what I expect
9 matches
Mail list logo
