Hi,
There appeared to be some porting progress right after the release, but
that seems to have stalled. The port is having trouble keeping up with
building and has some major flaws.
HPPA is clearly the worst at keeping up among the release
architectures[0], especially considering that mipsel has
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
> * What is the status of the different porting efforts?
Is there a list of different porting efforts?
> * Has progress been made regarding the thread library migration?
The thread library migration code is complete, and passes the
testsuite wit
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 05:09:25PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
> > * What is the status of the different porting efforts?
>
> Is there a list of different porting efforts?
>
> > * Has progress been made regarding the thread library migration?
dann frazier schrieb:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 05:09:25PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
>>> * Has progress been made regarding proper java support?
>> What is considered proper java support? GCJ?
>>
>> Dave, have you tinkered with GCJ lately?
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:34 PM, dann frazier wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 05:09:25PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
>> > * The machines that host the buildds still seem to have a very
>> > unreliable kernel. Is there any update on this?
>
Luk Claes wrote:
Hi,
HPPA is clearly the worst at keeping up among the release
architectures[0], especially considering that mipsel has some temporary
issues that are being worked on. This is causing large problems with
migrations.
...
[0] https://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph-week-big.png
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:57:28AM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:34 PM, dann frazier wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 05:09:25PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
>
> >> > * The machines that host the buildds still
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 07:31:46PM -0400, Brian Szymanski wrote:
> Luk Claes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> HPPA is clearly the worst at keeping up among the release
>> architectures[0], especially considering that mipsel has some temporary
>> issues that are being worked on. This is causing large problems wi
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 5:34 PM, dann frazier wrote:
>> > * Has progress been made regarding the thread library migration?
>>
>> The thread library migration code is complete, and passes the
>> testsuite without regression, including a bespoke testsuite I wrote to
>> verify the compatibility code
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> The only issue I've been aware of so far was the ruby build problem.
> If there are others, they need more publicity I think. OTOH, ISTR
> Carlos said most of the problems could go away with the transition to
> NPTL. Might be worth a try...
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:15 PM, dann frazier wrote:
>> >> No idea. Do you have a log?
>
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/
>
> Problems all appear to be w/ dpkg.
>
> build_netboot.log has this:
> Unpacking console-keymaps-at (from udebs/console-keymaps-at.udeb) ...
> *** glibc detec
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Brian Szymanski wrote:
> Luk Claes wrote:
> i don't dispute this, but i do find it anomalous/interesting that the ia64
> and hppa trajectories match *precisely*. that is, every time the ia64 build
> percent goes up in a given interval, so does that of hppa. every t
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:17:54AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 5:34 PM, dann frazier wrote:
> >> > * Has progress been made regarding the thread library migration?
> >>
> >> The thread library migration code is complete, and passes the
> >> testsuite without regression,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:24:34AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:15 PM, dann frazier wrote:
> >> >> No idea. Do you have a log?
> >
> > http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/
> >
> > Problems all appear to be w/ dpkg.
> >
> > build_netboot.log has this:
> > Unpa
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:49 AM, dann frazier wrote:
>> The transition plan has only been discussed verbally between Aurelian
>> and myself. In one week the 2.10 release comes out, and I plan to hand
>> Aurelian a new set of patches for debian to include. At this point
>> NPTL is officially turne
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 09:56:12AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > Unpacking busybox-udeb (from udebs/busybox-udeb.udeb) ...
> > > dpkg: error processing udebs/cdebconf-newt-terminal.udeb (--unpack):
> > > subprocess dpkg-split killed by signal (Segmentation fault)
> > > Errors were encountered w
Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 09:56:12AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
Unpacking busybox-udeb (from udebs/busybox-udeb.udeb) ...
dpkg: error processing udebs/cdebconf-newt-terminal.udeb (--unpack):
subprocess dpkg-split killed by signal (Segmentation fault)
Errors
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 03:34:36PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
...
> > > * The machines that host the buildds still seem to have a very
> > > unreliable kernel. Is there any update on this?
> >
> > I can't comment on this.
>
> Thibaut had planned to setup a second buildd (and I think had it up
> f
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 01:02:14PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 09:56:12AM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > > Unpacking busybox-udeb (from udebs/busybox-udeb.udeb) ...
> > > > dpkg: error processing udebs/cdebconf-newt-terminal.udeb (--unpack):
> > > > subprocess dpkg-spli
Matthias Klose wrote:
> dann frazier schrieb:
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 05:09:25PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
* Has progress been made regarding proper java support?
>>> What is considered proper java support? GCJ?
>>>
>>> Dave, have y
20 matches
Mail list logo
