> there might be a better way to check for this by using a preinst check.
> Carlos, can you take a look at this? I think sparc already a similar
> check.
I'll take a look at this tonight.
Thanks for everyone who is participating in making unstable better.
While I try to test various permutations
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin-=C9ric_Racine?= wrote:
> While anyone indeed can, those who do ought to be shot dead.
> Reasonable people use always kernel-package to make their own kernels. :)
Excuse me, but as a kernel developer I do that all day, every day.
Where do you think kernel packages come from?
> While anyone indeed can, those who do ought to be shot dead. Reasonable people
> use always kernel-package to make their own kernels. :)
if you do this once in a while, this is ok kernel-package
doesn't facilitate doing kernel development though.
> Btw, the same libc6 2.3.1 on i386 does no
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Randolph Chung wrote:
> > Then why doesn't the package itself depend on that kernel? If it did, apt
> > would have prevented the upgrade from ever being attempted at all...
>
> because anyone can compile a kernel themselves and install it, and dpkg
> only knows about debian
> Then why doesn't the package itself depend on that kernel? If it did, apt
> would have prevented the upgrade from ever being attempted at all...
because anyone can compile a kernel themselves and install it, and dpkg
only knows about debian packages.
there might be a better way to check for th
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 10:41:24AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > > Inteesting question. One could install a kernel by hand (not as a
> > > package). Thus a runtime test would probably be more suite
live fast, die young ...
yesterday i set up my c200 with debian. headless.
no visualize fx2 support :-(
anyway, makes up a good server.
kernel-image-2.4.9 hpmc's mpg123 *ouch*
put debian.org stable into sources.list
fetch kernel-image-2.4.18 32bit hppa
dist-upgrade, reboot new kernel
works fine
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 10:41:24AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > Inteesting question. One could install a kernel by hand (not as a
> > package). Thus a runtime test would probably be more suited.
>
> The problem with a runtime test i.e. in the
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Martin-?ric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Then why doesn't the package itself depend on that kernel? If it did, apt
> > would have prevented the upgrade from ever being attempted at all...
>
> Inteesting question. One could install a kernel b
* Martin-?ric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Then why doesn't the package itself depend on that kernel? If it did, apt
> would have prevented the upgrade from ever being attempted at all...
Inteesting question. One could install a kernel by hand (not as a
package). Thus a runtime test would proba
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Randolph Chung wrote:
> > > Please upgrade to 2.4.19 :)
> >
> > Forget it. 2.4.19 dies within 5 minutes of uptime, on any architecture I
> > have.
> >
> > Anyhow, your sarcastic answer doesn't explain why even rebooting fails; the
> > kernel reports it is too old and that
> > Please upgrade to 2.4.19 :)
>
> Forget it. 2.4.19 dies within 5 minutes of uptime, on any architecture I
> have.
>
> Anyhow, your sarcastic answer doesn't explain why even rebooting fails; the
> kernel reports it is too old and that it tired to kill init.
eh? how is this a "sarcastic answe
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > In the above error, what is that "kernel too old" supposed to mean? I have:
> > Linux zarya 2.4.18 #3 ti loka?? 22 01:33:10 EEST 2002 parisc unknown
> > unknown GNU/Linux
>
> Please upgrade to 2.4.19 :)
Forget it. 2.4.19 dies within 5 minutes of
> In the above error, what is that "kernel too old" supposed to mean? I have:
> Linux zarya 2.4.18 #3 ti loka?? 22 01:33:10 EEST 2002 parisc unknown unknown
> GNU/Linux
Please upgrade to 2.4.19 :)
c.
Some package I installed required an upgrade of libc6, which resulted in the
following error message, during installation:
*
Preparing to replace libc6 2.2.5-14.3 (using .../libc6_2.3.1-5_hppa.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
FATAL: kernel too old
dpkg: warning - old post-removal scrip
15 matches
Mail list logo
