Hi,
while compiling ncurses, I get the following warnings:
Note that I am using gcc 2.7.2.3, so this may be the reason, too.
In file included from /usr/i386-gnu/include/bits/errno.h:307,
from /usr/i386-gnu/include/errno.h:36,
from ../../ncurses/curses.priv.h:91,
Gordon Matzigkeit wrote:
> MP> - who maintains the Hurd pages on the GNU website?
>
> Those pages were originally written by Trent Fisher, then modified by
> various GNU people when they moved to www.gnu.org. Then I updated
> them with the information that I had as of last July or so. Since
> t
"M.C. Vernon" wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> It took far too long to do, but It's done. Theres a link from
> http://pick.sel.cam.ac.uk , or for the impatient amongst you, it's:
> http://pick.sel.cam.ac.uk/~mcv21/hurd.html
Did anyone make a copy of this before Matthew's machine went offline. I'd
Matthias Pfisterer wrote:
> 1. Update Webpages and FAQ (until end of this week):
> They should state that there is work ongoin to a new distribution of
> Hurd, which is already considered quite stable. They should give the
> reader the choice to either install the 0.2 release or the actual
> devel
Hi!
> Marcus Brinkmann writes:
MB> On Sun, Dec 27, 1998 at 10:35:38PM -0600, Gordon Matzigkeit
MB> wrote:
MB> We would then have libc0.2, libc0.3, libc0.4 etc packages, and
MB> binary packages depending on them. We would only maintain one set
MB> of development packages. Can you explain
Hi!
> Matthias Pfisterer writes:
MP> - who maintains the Hurd pages on the GNU website?
Those pages were originally written by Trent Fisher, then modified by
various GNU people when they moved to www.gnu.org. Then I updated
them with the information that I had as of last July or so. Since
On Sun, Dec 27, 1998 at 10:35:38PM -0600, Gordon Matzigkeit wrote:
>
> MB> We would then have libc0.2, libc0.3, libc0.4 etc packages, and
> MB> binary packages depending on them. We would only maintain one set
> MB> of development packages. Can you explain the drawbacks of this
> MB> simple so
Hello,
After positive feedback from you, I decided to do some work on the
documentation of Hurd. Here are my plans:
1. Update Webpages and FAQ (until end of this week):
They should state that there is work ongoin to a new distribution of
Hurd, which is already considered quite stable. They shoul
Hi!
> Matthias Pfisterer writes:
MP> - On the other hand, most obvious to me is the lack of
MP> documentation in the Hurd project.
I agree! The main trick is to find things that you are sure that
won't change before you finish documenting them.
MP> So I think I will start to improve the
Hi!
> Marcus Brinkmann writes:
MB> Why can't we just bump the soname each time the hurd-i386 glibc
MB> packages have an incompatible API change? Note that you can have
MB> multiple libc6 packages with different sonames installed, so old
MB> binaries will continue to work. The versioned de
Hi,
deb_{install,remove} worked fine, but had some problems with regard to conf
files etc. Reimplementing dpkg's behaviour in a simple fell script is not
feasible in the short life span of these scripts.
I therefore followed another approach in my new script, dpkg_hurd, which is
heavily based on
11 matches
Mail list logo
