On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 06:21:40PM +, Chris Lingard wrote:
>
> Home made, started life as a 486 25Mhz 2Mb; and some parts are still
> original
>
> Bought a second hand mother board from a game player who wanted a faster
> machine;
> mother board runs at 66Mhz with K6 clocked at 230 Mhz.
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 11:30:30AM -0700, Jim Franklin wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
> I just heard a couple of days ago that XFree86 4.0 is out. I know you
> were putting together some X patches and didn't know if this might be
> value to you.
I am not sure. My main goal is to get some X packages into t
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 12:45:25PM +, Chris Lingard wrote:
> > >
> > > Note that a full glibc build needs 640MB disk space and might crash a few
> > > times
> > > on the Hurd.
> > >
> >
> > You forget to mention that it takes over 16 hours! Only got one crash when
Hi Marcus,
I just heard a couple of days ago that XFree86 4.0 is out. I know you
were putting together some X patches and didn't know if this might be
value to you.
http://www.xfree86.org/#news
Jim
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> here are further patches for X. I grep'd for linux and ch
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 02:21:26AM -0800, Gregory Ade wrote:
> I take it that these niceties have to be
> downloaded from the debian package ftp sites?
Yes.
> is there a list that someone may have put together of what needs to be
> installed yet to actually do something usefull with a Hurd
>
>
> Details would have been useful. I think this is not a special Hurd issue,
> but anyway. I believe gconv-modules is obsolete and included in libc0.2.
>
I was not running screen at the time, and it will nor repeat the message again
but
it was lots of complaints about the shared libraries in /
On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 12:53:13AM -0500, Neal H Walfield wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am working on a pthread implementation to run under gnu mach for my
> OS project this semester; expect to see some bits in the next month or
> so.
I hope you contacted Mark Kettenis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> before startin
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 09:39:17PM -0500, Lucas C. Wagner wrote:
> >
> > This is very wrong, please don't make such errornous statements in the
> > public. It only alienates people.
> >
>
> Well, aside from the political correctness, I would say many people view it
> as a replacement for the Linux
Well, after a few months of lurking on the various hurd mailling lists, I
finally got up the gumption to actually install the Hurd. I hedged my
bets, and managed to get it running in a VMware sandbox, which is likely
where it will stay, until such time as I have a free machine (or get that
486 run
On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 11:01:16AM +0100, Niels Möller wrote:
> Igor Khavkine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Well, that's what I was asking about. Maybe a better idea would be to make
> > pfinet support a general tunneling interface that gives control of the
> > underlying protocol to a users
Hi all,
I am working on a pthread implementation to run under gnu mach for my
OS project this semester; expect to see some bits in the next month or
so.
Here is the problem that I have run into so far:
Background:
As a minimal implementation, I have a basic pthread_t, pthread_attr_t and
pthread
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000 21:39:17 EST, the world broke into rejoicing as
"Lucas C. Wagner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > This is very wrong, please don't make such errornous statements in the
> > public. It only alienates people.
>
> Well, aside from the political correctness, I would say many people
>
> This is very wrong, please don't make such errornous statements in the
> public. It only alienates people.
>
Well, aside from the political correctness, I would say many people view it
as a replacement for the Linux kernel even if those are not the words that
you would choose to say them in.
13 matches
Mail list logo
