On 18 Mar 2000, Brian May wrote:
I have heard (3rd hand) that ACL (access control lists) are directly
supported by EXT2 (although user programs are still in development).
Hmm. The latest version of EXT3 I've seen (at
ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/sct/fs/jfs/) doesn't have any ACL
support,
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 08:41:59PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 07:59:15PM +0100, Zsombor Gergely wrote:
Everybody seems to know what the login shell is useful for.
I am an unfortunate exception. Please, explain me this!
You are desperately in need for a shell, to
Well, we can think about that when there really /is/ an install.
Alan P. Laudicina wrote:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 08:41:59PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 07:59:15PM +0100, Zsombor Gergely wrote:
Everybody seems to know what the login shell is useful for.
I am
Gregory == Gregory Ade [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gregory On 18 Mar 2000, Brian May wrote:
I have heard (3rd hand) that ACL (access control lists) are
directly supported by EXT2 (although user programs are still in
development).
Gregory Hmm. The latest version of EXT3
-Original Message-
From: Alan P. Laudicina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2000 4:09 AM
To: Marcus Brinkmann
Cc: Debian Hurd list
Subject: Re: Small Bug - silly question again
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 08:41:59PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Mar 16,
On 20 Mar 2000 16:15:35 +1100, the world broke into rejoicing as
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Somebody told me ACLs were already in EXT2, just not supported by user
tools yet...
There are some basic hooks that have been in place in the kernel since
about '97. Due to Ted Ts'o.
The
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
You are desperately in need for a shell, to read your email (via IMAP),
browse the net, check a domain name, or whatever. A machine is nearby
running the Hurd.
You go to the machine and use it.
I started this thread and here is where I comment
Hello Alan P. Laudicina!
On Sun, 19 March 2000 at 01:09:07, you wrote:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 08:41:59PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
You go to the machine and use it.
On a second thought - you don't just 'use' a machine that displays
a friendly XDM login screen - probably the
Alan P. Laudicina [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
You are desperately in need for a shell, to read your email (via IMAP),
browse the net, check a domain name, or whatever. A machine is nearby
running the Hurd.
You go to the machine and use it.
Hi Jeff
I really like your page on cross compilation. Is there any reason to
not use egcs 1.1.2 for the entire process?
Jim
Jeff Bailey wrote:
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 10:11:43PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
I have documented what works for me at http://hurd.zugzug.com/ - The only
change
Alan P. Laudicina [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
You are desperately in need for a shell, to read your email (via IMAP),
browse the net, check a domain name, or whatever. A machine is nearby
running the Hurd.
You go to the machine and
I'm sure this discussion has been enlightening to all those involved, but I
think it has run its course and I'm tired of it filling up my mailbox now.
I have not really been paying attention, but from what I have noticed the
the discussion that has taken place is not about the Hurd, but about
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 08:19:05AM -0700, Jim Franklin wrote:
Thanks. egcs ought to work for the entire process - I chose to use the
most recent compiler for 2 reasons:
1) There were some significant improvements in the cross-compiler stuff
in the 2.95 series. This is not particularily
I need to go through the effort of figuring out how to setup OSKit
GNUMach. Once that is done, I will change the instructions so that egcs
isn't used at all. (Contributions welcome!! hint, hint - for that and
any other 'help documentation that people want posted').
For oskit and gnumach
14 matches
Mail list logo
