On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 12:13:54PM -0500, Cowboy wrote:
> I understand that the standard is info files, a reader which I've yet to
> get working before a new version come out, or an update to a system,
> which renders the working version broken, and the documents unreadable,
> or with great dif
>> From: Matthew Emmett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cowboy) writes:
>>
>> > While I agree in principal, and acknowledge that the prefered method does
>> > not fit my preference, I submit that there are cases ( such as a crippled
>> > system where various word processors will
On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 02:51:34PM +0200, Juli-Manel Merino Vidal wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is it there a FAT translator in order to use dos filesystems int the
> Hurd ? I think that there is not any of this out there, but anybody is
> working on this ?
>
> Bye!
Markus made a read-only one.
It works
Tomasz Wegrzanowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With 'ls -f', things are unsorted in every dir, no matter
> if they should be or not.
> It would be great help in mc/GUIs if they were sorted by default, only
> unsorted in dirs marked ``dont-sort''.
The traditional way to do things like that woul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cowboy) writes:
> While I agree in principal, and acknowledge that the prefered method does
> not fit my preference, I submit that there are cases ( such as a crippled
> system where various word processors will not work ) when ANY meta
> info within a document is a bad thin
>> Wed, 2 Aug 2000 20:41:21 -0500 (EST) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Cowboy) wrote:
>> > Can we agree to post 100K attachments to ONE list ?
>> > ( or preferably, an FTP site. Perhaps an open site, like mine )
>> > Those of us subscribed to more than one, and some paying by
>> > the minute, would appreci
>> On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 09:01:24PM -0500, Cowboy wrote:
>> > How about text ?
>> > It's 100% compatible with anything.
>>
>> That's true, and text is a good choice for small snippets like READMEs etc.
>>
>> However, you can barely convert it to anything useful, because it contains
>> no s
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 15:08:46 +0200
From: Juli-Manel Merino Vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi all,
I've been reading (a bit) the source code of the ext2fs... Why it maps
the entire filesystem into vm ?
Because that's convenient? :-)
Somebody told me here that this way the filesyst
Am Fre, 04 Aug 2000 14:51:34 Juli-Manel Merino Vidal Sie:
> Hi all,
>
> Is it there a FAT translator in order to use dos filesystems int the
> Hurd ? I think that there is not any of this out there, but anybody is
> working on this ?
I wrote a fatfs which can read FAT12/16/32. It does not support
Hi all,
I've been reading (a bit) the source code of the ext2fs... Why it maps
the entire filesystem into vm ?
Somebody told me here that this way the filesystem can't be bigger
than 1GB. But this only applies to the root filesystem, isn't it ?
I've mounted a bigger partition and works fine. Why?
Hi all,
Is it there a FAT translator in order to use dos filesystems int the
Hurd ? I think that there is not any of this out there, but anybody is
working on this ?
Bye!
--
Juli-Manel Merino Vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Become a GNU! (http://www.gnu.or
Am Fre, 04 Aug 2000 14:28:26 Juli-Manel Merino Vidal Sie:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been reading about Hurd and found in several places the "shadow
> filesystem", but what's that ?
It's a good idea: Shadow several filesystems over each other, so you
see the content of all of them in a single directory t
Hi all,
I've been reading about Hurd and found in several places the "shadow
filesystem", but what's that ?
Thanks.
--
Juli-Manel Merino Vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Become a GNU! (http://www.gnu.org)
Running Debian GNU/Linux woody
---
Check out the package i386-gnu-gcc in the archive.
Marcus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> after fighting for two days and nights building a xgcc I\'ve given up.
> My i386->arm xgcc is still working, so I didn\'t mess up my system too much,
> but I simply don\'t want to waste more time on s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi,
>
> after fighting for two days and nights building a xgcc I\'ve given up.
> My i386->arm xgcc is still working, so I didn\'t mess up my system too much,
> but I simply don\'t want to waste more time on something that already has
> been done hundreds of times.
>
Hi,
after fighting for two days and nights building a xgcc I\'ve given up.
My i386->arm xgcc is still working, so I didn\'t mess up my system too much,
but I simply don\'t want to waste more time on something that already has been
done hundreds of times.
Can anyone give me a pointer to a working
Hi all,
somebody asked me to translate my new install manual from spanish into
english. Well, I've done that, but this time I've used texinfo :). You
can take a look to it in:
http://jmmv.cjb.net/hurd
Bye!
--
Juli-Manel Merino Vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
17 matches
Mail list logo
