I've uploaded a build of Tcl 8.3, with Tk 8.3 to follow,
and hopefully Objective CAML shortly thereafter.
I seem to recall there being a problem with dh_strip. Can
anyone tell me (if this is true) what the resolution for
this was?
I'm getting a few builds that crash on dh_strip due to a
"permiss
On 30 Oct 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> Philip> I have not found anyone to host them yet.
>
> Is this still true? I can put them in my HTTP directory on
> people.debian.org if you like. Let me know where I can grab them.
>
The problem is that I have very limited space and I am limited
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > > "Philip" == Philip Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Philip> On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, ryan.tecco wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> these boot floppies - do they work with the new distro?
> > >> what's the location of the n
> If you just want to examine the L4 API, you might just as well use
> L4Linux; all L4 system calls are available. There is also a small
> multi-server OS available for L4KA which would make interesting study
> material.
A small multi-server OS for L4Ka? Where? I'm running L4ka's template
root_
> is it possible/practical to implement device drivers under Hurd as
> translators in user space? I think of removing all the device drivers
> from GNUmach (or whatever micro kernel we use then ;), which already
> make this micro kernel quite big. Then, you could for example settrans
> /hurd/devi
Roland,
> > need to reply like this. Basically, you suggest nothing less than to shut
> > up and do our own non-approved stuff without asking for feedback from the
> > list. This is asking for a split in development :-((( Sad perspectives...,
> > but splits are necessary sometimes.
> I didn't say
> > "Philip" == Philip Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Philip> On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, ryan.tecco wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> these boot floppies - do they work with the new distro?
> >> what's the location of the new distro and the boot floppies?
> >>
>
> Philip
> "Philip" == Philip Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Philip> On Wed, 25 Oct 2000, ryan.tecco wrote:
>>
>>
>> these boot floppies - do they work with the new distro?
>> what's the location of the new distro and the boot floppies?
>>
Philip> I have not found a
Ad Buijsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The HURD relies heavily on mach: ports are used profusely and threads
> are assumed to be available in bucketloads. L4 offers nothing like
> ports and the maximum numbers of threads per task is quite limited.
> There are ways to overcome the latter, but
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 07:18:48PM +0100, Erik Verbruggen wrote:
> > My concerns last time I looked at L4 was
> >
> > (i) It was written in C++, which I dislike (that's a religious
> > question, and this is not the right place to argue the details).
>
> Erm, ok, you took that implementati
>
> However, I think Mach emulation would be a good thing as the first
> step, because you will be able to investigate how different L4 is from
> Mach and what would be necessary to be done in details. But I'd like
> to point out that Mach emulation should be temporary but not a
> permanent sol
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 06:28:41PM +0100, Niels Möller wrote:
> Erik Verbruggen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ok, I think the L4 stuff needs a bit of background. Special for Niels: I
> > started doing a Sparc port, but there were some problems which are
> > similair to those that the Alpha por
Ok, I don't get dselect-apt to work.
I can update the filr containing the package description. I can also
select the packages.
But, I can not download them. The package download starts fine, but
nothing is received. The screen is filled up with lines of:
0% . Query .
and after a while i ge
Am Mon, 30 Okt 2000 18:05:57 schrieb Martin Maciaszek:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 02:01:28PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > Am Mon, 30 Okt 2000 13:09:08 schrieb Martin Maciaszek:
> > > I tried to install GNU/Hurd on my computer. AFAIR Hurd supports
> > > the Adaptec AHA-2940UW. So I unpacked the
Erik Verbruggen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, I think the L4 stuff needs a bit of background. Special for Niels: I
> started doing a Sparc port, but there were some problems which are
> similair to those that the Alpha port has, so that's why I react.
Thanks for the info. I've tried browsing
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 02:01:28PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Am Mon, 30 Okt 2000 13:09:08 schrieb Martin Maciaszek:
> > I tried to install GNU/Hurd on my computer. AFAIR Hurd supports
> > the Adaptec AHA-2940UW. So I unpacked the tarball. Unfortunately
> > the kernel doesn't boot very far. I
*long explanation alert*
Ok, I think the L4 stuff needs a bit of background. Special for Niels: I
started doing a Sparc port, but there were some problems which are
similair to those that the Alpha port has, so that's why I react.
(oh, and I have an Alpha, so I'm also interested in the Alpha po
Hi,
I didn't find any dhcp clients in the Sid packages. Does it exist a Hurd
DHCP client? If not, does Hurd support all the features such a client
need (I think so)?
--
Belle idée mais ça ne marche pas. Fufe est plein de fufistes.
-+- JR in: Guide du Cabaliste Usenet - Fa f'est vrai,
On 30 Oct 2000, Niels Möller wrote:
> Erik Verbruggen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> What about security? I don't know L4 much (although a read some paper
> on it a long time ago, the last time Hurd on L4 was discussed). My
> impression was that L4 was a lot different from Mach. As the HURD
> re
Moritz Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Then, you could for example settrans /hurd/devices/floppy to
> /dev/fd0 and had your floppy drive available as /dev/fd0. What do
> you think about it? Is it practical? This would also make the Hurd
> more independent from the underlying micro kernel, be
On 30 Oct 2000, Moritz Schulte wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is it possible/practical to implement device drivers under Hurd as
> translators in user space? I think of removing all the device drivers
> from GNUmach (or whatever micro kernel we use then ;), which already
> make this micro kernel quite b
Am Mon, 30 Okt 2000 13:09:08 schrieb Martin Maciaszek:
> I tried to install GNU/Hurd on my computer. AFAIR Hurd supports
> the Adaptec AHA-2940UW. So I unpacked the tarball. Unfortunately
> the kernel doesn't boot very far. It detects the Adaptec but
> hangs there. From Linux I know that the next s
Hello,
is it possible/practical to implement device drivers under Hurd as
translators in user space? I think of removing all the device drivers
from GNUmach (or whatever micro kernel we use then ;), which already
make this micro kernel quite big. Then, you could for example settrans
/hurd/device
Martin Maciaszek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tried to install GNU/Hurd on my computer. AFAIR Hurd supports
> the Adaptec AHA-2940UW. So I unpacked the tarball. Unfortunately
> the kernel doesn't boot very far. It detects the Adaptec but
> hangs there. From Linux I know that the next step would
I tried to install GNU/Hurd on my computer. AFAIR Hurd supports
the Adaptec AHA-2940UW. So I unpacked the tarball. Unfortunately
the kernel doesn't boot very far. It detects the Adaptec but
hangs there. From Linux I know that the next step would be to
detect the devices attached to the Adaptec. But
Ron Farrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Great! Let's see what everyone thinks. If the majory think this is
> worthwile (I do, and hope everyone else does) then we'll see how we can=20
> organize specific tasks for people...=20
I could cast my vote here, but that would be pointless. It doesn't
re
Erik Verbruggen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Indeed. The nice thing about L4 is that it's simple and lean, and
> therefore fast. The emulation layer will definitely reduce speed. For
> example with IPC: I think the way to emulate the Mach behaviour (and to
> circumvent the page alignment) is to c
Yes, the culprit is 'xterm'
After compiling rxvt (thanks for the patch, Marcus) the command 'file /dev/tty'
gives me
'character special (0/0) in rxvt. So now it works.
Too bad I do not have the time to check the xterm source, Marcus said it is
hard to read
(spaghetti). And Ctrl-Z, Ctrl-C work i
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 09:14:18AM +0900, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
> From: Ron Farrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Hurd-alpha-devel] Re: L4 instead of gnumach?
> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 16:19:30 -0700
>
> > This is not completely decided. A MACH emulation layer for L4 was the
> > original idea
The link ("easy guide to installing the Hurd on a Linux box.") seems to be down
and has been that way for over a month. Can someone fix it.
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 03:49:01PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Is it _absolutely_ necessary to use glibc with the Hurd?
>
> Why on earth would one want not to? The Hurd developers have no interest
> whatsoever in using anything but the GNU C library for the GNU system.
think about embedded
31 matches
Mail list logo
