Re: glibc 2.2.2-1 uploaded ... Time for a new CD?

2001-02-27 Thread Philip Charles
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > Hi, > > I uploaded glibc 2.2.2-1 packages. They are currently in > http://incoming.debian.org, and will beinstalled with the next dinstall run > if everything goes well. They work fine for me. With all these uploads it seems that new CD images are c

Re: porting to Hurd

2001-02-27 Thread Atsuhito Kohda
From: Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: porting to Hurd Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 02:06:17 +0100 > > At present I succeeded in building jtex-bin, xdvik-ja, vflib2 > > nkf, dvi2tty. I hope I could build new tetex packages which > > are not in consistent state right now. > > That's gr

Re: porting to Hurd

2001-02-27 Thread Atsuhito Kohda
From: Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: porting to Hurd Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 01:56:14 +0100 > On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 01:39:57AM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > > It might be more useful if someone gets X4 to run on hurd. > > It might be useful if Branden would incorporate my p

Re: porting to Hurd

2001-02-27 Thread Atsuhito Kohda
From: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: porting to Hurd Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 01:39:57 +0100 > Previously Atsuhito Kohda wrote: > > There is no gnupg in Hurd but I have only gnupg key registered > > as Debian developer so I am afraid I can not upload a package > > even if I can bu

glibc 2.2.2-1 uploaded (-> network ioctls, ifconfig, eventually PPP)

2001-02-27 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
Hi, I uploaded glibc 2.2.2-1 packages. They are currently in http://incoming.debian.org, and will beinstalled with the next dinstall run if everything goes well. They work fine for me. >From this version on (with a recent Hurd) we have my network ioctl implementation available in the Debian packa

gnupg 1.0.4-3 uploaded

2001-02-27 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
Hi, I uploaded gnupg 1.0.4-3 to non-us. It will be installed with the next Debian run, *if* it correctly signed itself (See Version field in the signature below ;) I don't know if the incoming directory of non-us can be accessed by the public in the meantime (up to one day). The file will be avai

Re: porting to Hurd

2001-02-27 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 02:06:17AM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > [Jeff, see below on tetex] (Thanks for the headsup) > On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:59:27AM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote: > That's great! It's also good that you post your intention about tetex, so no > effort is made twice. I am po

Re: porting to Hurd

2001-02-27 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
[Jeff, see below on tetex] On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 08:59:27AM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote: > I intend to port some package to Hurd but I guess there are > some problems. Let's take this to debian-hurd. > There is no gnupg in Hurd but I have only gnupg key registered > as Debian developer so I a

Re: porting to Hurd

2001-02-27 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 01:39:57AM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > It might be more useful if someone gets X4 to run on hurd. It might be useful if Branden would incorporate my patches next time (should be next week). I had working and complete patches for X 3.3.6 and X 4.0 packages submitted to

Re: porting to Hurd

2001-02-27 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Atsuhito Kohda wrote: > There is no gnupg in Hurd but I have only gnupg key registered > as Debian developer so I am afraid I can not upload a package > even if I can build a package in Hurd. How should I do? You can sign it under Linux just fine. Just build the package unsigned under

porting to Hurd

2001-02-27 Thread Atsuhito Kohda
Hi all, I intend to port some package to Hurd but I guess there are some problems. There is no gnupg in Hurd but I have only gnupg key registered as Debian developer so I am afraid I can not upload a package even if I can build a package in Hurd. How should I do? At present I succeeded in build

Re: new apt_0.5.0.deb testing

2001-02-27 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 09:44:31AM +1100, Brian May wrote: > Marcus> dummy package and put them on alpha.gnu.org until dpkg is > Marcus> fixed. What do we need beside sysvinit? > > strace? > > (that way, the task-devel-common package will install) I am afraid that this is a bit too much,

Re: new apt_0.5.0.deb testing

2001-02-27 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 11:21:19AM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > * Change the section of these to "dummy" or similar, so that some > casually browser won't get false impressions. I can easily imagine > myself going through the package list, saying "oh, someone has > ported XYZ, how nice",

Re: hurd-ja.texi

2001-02-27 Thread mihi~star
Hello. > Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 11:37:05PM +0900, mihi~star wrote: > > > Finally, I've finished transration of The GNU Hurd Reference > > > Manual which is packed in hurd_20001204.tar.gz. > > > > I mean, having

Re: new apt_0.5.0.deb testing

2001-02-27 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We should create dummy package and put them on alpha.gnu.org until > dpkg is fixed. That's a good idea. I have two suggestions: * Change the section of these to "dummy" or similar, so that some casually browser won't get false impressions. I can e

GNUYahoo for Hurd

2001-02-27 Thread M.P.Anand Babu
A very pre version of GNUYahoo is released. Core developer: Bala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> With Support from: Nagappan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> K.Visu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> M.P.AnandBabu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> By tomorrow Bala will add info file. I have added the Makefile support